CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,097Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM‐IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social funtioning

Morosini, P.L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., Pioli, R.·2000·Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
DOI 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004323.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Morosini P‐L, Magliano L, Brambilla L, Ugolini S, Pioli R. Development, reliability and acceptability of a new version of the DSM‐IV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS) to assess routine social funtioning. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2000: 101:323–329. © Munksgaard 2000. Objective: Development of a scale to assess patients' social functioning, the Personal and Social Performance scale (PSP). Method: PSP has been developed through focus groups and reliability studies on the basis of the social functioning component of the DSM‐TV Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS). The last reliability study was carried out by 39 workers with different professional roles on a sample of 61 psychiatric patients admitted to the rehabilitation unit. Each patient was rated independently on the scale by the two workers who knew them best. Results: The PSP is a 100–point single‐item rating scale, subdivided into 10 equal intervals. The ratings are based mainly on the assessment of patient's functioning in four main areas: 1) socially useful activities; 2) personal and social relationships; 3) self‐care; and 4) disturbing and aggressive behaviours. Operational criteria to rate the levels of disabilities have been defined for the above‐mentioned areas. Excellent inter‐rater reliability was also obtained in less educated workers. Conclusion: Compared to SOFAS, PSP has better face validity and psychometric properties. It was found to be an acceptable, quick and valid measure of patients' personal and social functioning.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004323.x

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 12 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Morosini PL, 1988, Disabiliti sociale e carico familiare: studio di riproducibilità di un nuovo strumento di valutazione, Riv Speriment Fren, 112, 541
  2. Morosini PL, 1991, Routine assessment tools in psychiatry: a questionnaire on family attitudes and burden, Ital J Psychiatr Behav Sci, 1, 95
  3. Magliano L, 1993, Studio di riproducibilità di un' intervista semi‐strutturata per l'accertamento della disabilità sociale e del carico familiare (ADC), Riv Riabilitaz Psichiatr Psicosoc, 2, 49
  4. Morosini PL, 1998, VADO — Valu tazione di Abilita, Definizione di Obiettivi
  5. Moroslini PL, 1996, Prima validazione ed applicazione di uno strumento clinico‐epidemiologico per valutare gli esiti nella riabilitazione psichiatrica: DI. SA, Disabilita e Salute, Riv Speriment Fren, 5, 817
  6. 1992, Stata — Statistics/graphics/data management
  7. 1997, SPSS — Statistical Package for Social Sciences

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 1,001–1,003 of 1,003

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Morosini, P. L., Magliano, L., Brambilla, L., Ugolini, S., & Pioli, R.
Corresponding author
Morosini, P.L.
ORCID
Magliano, L.
Venue
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-04
Volume
101
Issue
4
Pages
323-329
ISSN
  • 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0447
DOI
10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101004323.x
OpenAlex
W4244847179
Cited by
1,097
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 40 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 86 · 2020: 154 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 77 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 73 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 32
FWCI
0.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 632 d)
Locations
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
SOFA, occupational functioning, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, acceptability, DSM-IV, psychiatric assessment instruments

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review