The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To review validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). METHOD: A systematic search was performed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (ISI) from the period 1987-2000. For sensitivity and specificity of the EPDS presented in each study, 95% confidence intervals were estimated. Positive and negative predictive values were estimated assuming prevalences of postpartum depression ranging from 5% to 20%. RESULTS: Eighteen validation studies were identified. The study design varied between studies. The sensitivity and specificity estimates also varied: 65-100% and 49-100%, respectively. The confidence intervals were estimated to be wide. Our estimates suggest a lower positive predictive value in a normal population than in the validation study samples. CONCLUSION: Most studies show a high sensitivity of the EPDS. Because of the differences in study design and large confidence intervals, uncertainty remains regarding the comparability between the sensitivity and specificity estimates of the different EPDS versions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Detection of Postnatal Depression: Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale
Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 · Cited by 14,183
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: History, Rationale, and Description
Spitzer, R. L. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005 · Cited by 4,336
Rates and risk of postpartum depression – a meta-analysis
O'hara, M. W., & Swain, A. M. (1996) · International Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/09540269609037816 · Cited by 3,116
A Prospective Study of Emotional Disorders in Childbearing Women
Kumar, R., & Robson, K. M. (1984) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.144.1.35 · Cited by 980
Lee, D. T. S., Yip, S. K., Chiu, H. F. K., Leung, T. Y. S., Chan, K. P. M., Chau, I. O. L., Leung, H. C. M., & Chung, T. K. H. (1998) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.172.5.433 · Cited by 578
Deutschsprachige Fassung und Validierung der »Edinburgh postnatal depression scale«
Bergant, A. M., Nguyen, T., Heim, K., Ulmer, H., & Dapunt, O. (2008) · DMW - Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift · doi:10.1055/s-2007-1023895 · Cited by 318
The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: Validation for an Italian sample
Benvenuti, P. (1999) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(98)00102-5 · Cited by 300
Cited by
Wisner, K. L., Sit, D. K. Y., McShea, M. C., Rizzo, D. M., Zoretich, R. A., Hughes, C. L., Eng, H. F., Luther, J. F., Wisniewski, S. R., Costantino, M. L., et al. (2013) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87 · Cited by 1,091
Gibson, J., McKenzie‐McHarg, K., Shakespeare, J., Price, J., & Gray, R. (2009) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01363.x · Cited by 991
Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: A large prospective study
Milgrom, J., Gemmill, A. W., Bilszta, J. L., Hayes, B., Barnett, B., Brooks, J., Ericksen, J., Ellwood, D., & Buist, A. (2008) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2007.10.014 · Cited by 953
Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS).
Watson, D., O'Hara, M. W., Simms, L. J., Kotov, R., Chmielewski, M., McDade-Montez, E. A., Gamez, W., & Stuart, S. (2007) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.253 · Cited by 740
Hahn-Holbrook, J., Cornwell-Hinrichs, T., & Anaya, I. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2017.00248 · Cited by 667
Metadata
- Authors
- Eberhard‐Gran, M., Eskild, A., Tambs, K., Opjordsmoen, S., & Samuelsen, S. O.
- Venue
- Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 104
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 243-249
- ISSN
- 0001-690X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072795413
- Cited by
- 491
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 9.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
- The paper
- Eberhard‐Gran, M., Eskild, A., Tambs, K., Opjordsmoen, S., & Samuelsen, S. O. (2001). Review of validation studies of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2001.00187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.