The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants
Abstract
Osseointegrated implants as anchors for various prosthetic reconstructions have become a predictable treatment alternative. It was expected that implants required submucosal placement during the healing period for successful tissue integration. However, it has been demonstrated that healing and long-term health of implants could be achieved with equal predictability in a 1-stage, non-submerged approach. This prospective 5-year study not only calculates implant success by life table analysis, but also evaluates the correlation between observed bone level changes with clinical parameters as measured by suppuration, plaque indices, bleeding indices, probing depth, attachment level and mobility. A total of 112 ITI dental implants were inserted in different areas of the jaws. Clinical and radiographic parameters were evaluated annually for 5 years, whereas a portion of the study group for which 6-year evaluations were available were included in the life-table analysis. The overall success rate after 5 years in service was 99.1%, while after 6 years it was reduced to 95.5% due to the fracture of 3 implants in 1 patient. The mean crestal bone loss experienced during the first year was 0.6 mm followed by an annual yearly loss of approximately 0.05 mm. No significant differences could be found between the amount of bone loss measured at each of the yearly follow-up visits. This suggests that statistically the followed implants did not show any radiographically measurable bone loss following the initial period of bone loss associated with implant placement and osseointegration. Low levels of correlation between the individual and cumulative clinical parameters with radiographically measured bone loss suggests that these parameters are of limited clinical value in assessing and predicting future peri-implant bone loss.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schrott, A. R., Jimenez, M., Hwang, J., Fiorellini, J., & Weber, H. (2009) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01795.x · Cited by 310
Self-citationReliability of periodontal diagnostic tools for monitoring peri‐implant health and disease
Coli, P., Christiaens, V., Sennerby, L., & Bruyn, H. D. (2017) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/prd.12162 · Cited by 134
Is Peri-Implant Probing Causing Over-Diagnosis and Over-Treatment of Dental Implants?
Coli, P., & Sennerby, L. (2019) · Journal of Clinical Medicine · doi:10.3390/jcm8081123 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Weber, H.-P., Crohin, C. C., & Fiorellini, J. P.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 144-153
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W1985983221
- Cited by
- 245
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011002144.x
- The paper
- Weber, H.-P., Crohin, C. C., & Fiorellini, J. P. (2000). A 5-year prospective clinical and radiographic study of non-submerged dental implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2000.011002144.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.