Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 689

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: A model study in the dog

Berglundh, Tord, Abrahamsson, Ingemar, Lang, Niklaus P., Lindhe, Jan·2003·Clinical Oral Implants Research

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To describe a model for the investigation of different phases of wound healing that are involved in the process resulting in osseointegration. Material and methods: The implants used for the study of early healing had a geometry that corresponded to that of a solid screw implant with an SLA surface configuration. A circumferential trough had been prepared within the thread region (intra‐osseous portion) that established a geometrically well‐defined wound compartment. Twenty Labrador dogs received 160 experimental devices totally to allow the evaluation of healing between 2 h and 12 weeks. Both ground sections and decalcified sections were prepared from different implant sites. Results: The experimental chamber used appeared to be conducive for the study of early phases of bone formation. The ground sections provided an overview of the various phases of soft and hard tissue formation, while the decalcified, thin sections enabled a more detailed study of events involved in bone tissue modeling and remodeling. The initially empty wound chamber became occupied with a coagulum and a granulation tissue that was replaced by a provisional matrix. The process of bone formation started already during the first week. The newly formed bone present at the lateral border of the cut bony bed appeared to be continuous with the parent bone, but woven bone was also found on the SLA surface at a distance from the parent bone. This primary bone that included trabeculae of woven bone was replaced by parallel‐fibered and/or lamellar bone and marrow. Between 1 and 2 weeks, the bone tissue immediately lateral to the pitch region, responsible for primary mechanical stability of the device, became resorbed and replaced with newly formed viable bone. Despite this temporary loss of hard tissue contact, the implants remained clinically stable at all times. Conclusion: Osseointegration represents a dynamic process both during its establishment and its maintenance. In the establishment phase, there is a delicate interplay between bone resorption in contact regions (between the titanium body and mineralized bone) and bone formation in ‘contact‐ free’ areas. During the maintenance phase, osseointegration is secured through continuous remodeling and adaptation to function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 689

Metadata

Authors
Berglundh, T., Abrahamsson, I., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J.
Venue
Clinical Oral Implants Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
251-262
ISSN
  • 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0501
OpenAlex
W1520230219
Cited by
689
References
0
FWCI
10.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: A model study in the dog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x
The paper
Berglundh, T., Abrahamsson, I., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J. (2003). De novo alveolar bone formation adjacent to endosseous implants: A model study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.00972.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.