The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog
Abstract
Abstract: Following tooth extraction, a socket often presents dimensions that may be considerably greater that the diameter of a conventional implant. The present experiment was performed to study the healing that occurred adjacent to implants placed in recipient sites with a wide marginal defect. Four Labrador dogs were used. In the right side of the mandible, four experimental sites were prepared to receive titanium implants [sandblasted, large‐grit, acid‐etched (SLA) surface]. Traditional implant installation (control) was performed in one site. In the remaining three sites (test), a step drill was used to widen the marginal 5 mm of the canal. Following placement of an implant in a test site, a circumferential gap about 1–1.25 mm wide and 5 mm deep was present lateral to the implant. A resorbable barrier membrane was used to cover the implant and the bone tissue of two sites, while one site was left uncovered. Four months following implant installation, block biopsies of each implant site were obtained and prepared for ground sectioning. After 4 months of healing, the large marginal defect had been filled with newly formed bone. The degree of bone‐to‐implant contact between the newly formed tissue and the SLA surface was at all test sites high and similar to that obtained at control sites. The placement of a barrier membrane following implant installation did not improve the outcome of healing. We conclude that a marginal defect wider than 1 mm may heal with new bone and a high degree of osseointegration to an implant designed with a SLA surface.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Abrahamsson, I., Berglundh, T., Linder, E., Lang, N. P., & Lindhe, J. (2004) · Clinical Oral Implants Research · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01082.x · Cited by 450
Self-citationFit and forget: The future of dental implant therapy via nanotechnology
Gulati, K., Chopra, D., Kocak-Oztug, N. A., & Verron, E. (2023) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.addr.2023.114900 · Cited by 89
Metadata
- Authors
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Buser, D., & Lindhe, J.
- Venue
- Clinical Oral Implants Research
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01-31
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 35-42
- ISSN
- 0905-7161 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0501
- OpenAlex
- W1858310198
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
- The paper
- Botticelli, D., Berglundh, T., Buser, D., & Lindhe, J. (2003). The jumping distance revisited: An experimental study in the dog. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140105.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.