The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) – A clinical reaction pattern
Open accessAbstract
Background: A wide range of diseases or reactions can cause pustular eruptions of the skin. In this spectrum there seems to be a subgroup with characteristic clinical features and a typical course which is mostly caused by drugs for which the term acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP) has been established. Objective: To describe the clinical features of AGEP. Methods: The authors’ experience from a multinational epidemiological study on severe cutaneous adverse reactions and a comprehensive review of the literature were used to provide an overview of the disease and it’s possible causes. An algorithm for validating cases which was established for this study is also presented. Results: AGEP typically presents with at least dozens of non follicular sterile pustules occurring on a diffuse, edematous erythema predominalty in the folds and/or on the face. Fever and elevated blood neutrophils are common. Histopathology typically shows spongiform subcorneal and/or intraepidermal pustules, a marked edema of the papillary dermis, and eventually vasculitis, eosinophils and/or focal necrosis of keratinocytes. Onset is acute, most often following drug intake, but viral infections can also trigger the disease. Pustules resolve spontaneously in less than 15 days. Conclusion: The diagnosis AGEP should be considered in cases of acute pustular rashes and detection of the causative drug should be strived for. Knowledge of the clinical features and usual course of this disease can often prevent unnecessary therapeutical measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Systemically induced allergic exanthem from mercury
Lerch, M., & Bircher, A. J. (2004) · Contact Dermatitis · doi:10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00366.x · Cited by 101
Pattern Analysis of Drug-Induced Skin Diseases
Justiniano, H., Berlingeri-Ramos, A. C., & Sánchez, J. L. (2008) · The American Journal of Dermatopathology · doi:10.1097/dad.0b013e3181722ef4 · Cited by 86
Haskamp, S., Bruns, H., Hahn, M., Hoffmann, M., Gregor, A., Löhr, S., Hahn, J., Schauer, C., Ringer, M., Flamann, C., et al. (2020) · The American Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.07.001 · Cited by 84
Current perspectives on severe drug eruption
Zhang, J., Lei, Z., Xu, C., Zhao, J., & Kang, X. (2021) · Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology · doi:10.1007/s12016-021-08859-0 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- Sidoroff, A., Halevy, S., Bavinck, J. N. B., Vaillant, L., & Roujeau, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 113-119
- ISSN
- 0303-6987 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0560
- OpenAlex
- W2140341198
- Cited by
- 818
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.