The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Altitudinal body size clines: latitudinal effects associated with changing seasonality
Abstract
Within ectotherms, increases in body size with latitude are thought to be the consequence of the effect of a decline in development temperature, which results in a larger final body size. In contrast, latitudinal declines in body size are usually ascribed to limited resources. It has been suggested that if generation time is similar to or constitutes a significant proportion of the growing season length, then season length is likely to have a considerable influence on body size because of constraints on resource availability, so resulting in a decline in body size with temperature (latitude). However, if generation time declines relative to season length, resources effectively become available for longer. Temperature influences on growth and differentiation are likely to be most significant, resulting in an increase in body size with latitude. Here, we test the hypothesis by comparing intraspecific altitudinal body size clines in a monophyletic group of weevils from two regions that differ substantially in seasonality. On the relatively aseasonal Marion Island, body size increases with altitude, whereas on the more seasonal Heard Island the opposite is found. In addition, overlapping generations on Marion Island indicate year‐round resource availability, whereas more discrete generations on Heard Island indicate winter cessation of growth and development. Our data provide support for the hypothesis that the seasonality of resource availability has a major influence on body size clines. Furthermore, we argue that analysis of interspecific body size clines should be preceded by nested analyses of variance to determine the influence of clinal replacement of higher taxa on these patterns.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
The Comparative Method in Evolutionary Biology
Harvey, P. H., & Pagel, M. D. (1991) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 · Cited by 4,337
Scaling: Why is Animal Size so Important?
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139167826 · Cited by 2,677
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
Body size variation in insects: a macroecological perspective
Chown, S. L., & Gaston, K. J. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2009.00097.x · Cited by 772
Self-citationClimate warming and ectotherm body size – from individual physiology to community ecology
Ohlberger, J. (2013) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12098 · Cited by 406
Verberk, W. C. E. P., Atkinson, D., Hoefnagel, K. N., Hirst, A. G., Horne, C. R., & Siepel, H. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12653 · Cited by 363
Ecogeographical rules: elements of a synthesis
Gaston, K. J., Chown, S. L., & Evans, K. L. (2008) · Journal of Biogeography · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01772.x · Cited by 353
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Chown, S. L., & Klok, C. J.
- Venue
- Ecography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-455
- ISSN
- 0906-7590 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0587
- OpenAlex
- W2139047430
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 5.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Altitudinal body size clines: latitudinal effects associated with changing seasonality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03479.x
- The paper
- Chown, S. L., & Klok, C. J. (2003). Altitudinal body size clines: latitudinal effects associated with changing seasonality. Ecography. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0587.2003.03479.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.