Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography

O'Brien, Eileen M., Field, Richard, Whittaker, Robert J.·2000·Oikos

Abstract

Recent studies at the macro‐scale have demonstrated that geographic gradients in the richness of plants, in particular of woody plants such as trees and shrubs, can be viewed as by‐products of water‐energy dynamics. According to this view, they are climatic rather than latitudinal/longitudinal gradients, relating to coincident and predictable variations in planetary surface‐atmosphere thermal dynamics and consequent patterns in biological activity. Previous analyses have shown that a two‐variable model capturing the dynamic relationship between energy (heat/light) and water (rainfall) accounts for most of the variation in woody plant richness across southern Africa at species, genus, and family levels. Here we move towards a more complete explanation, while demonstrating how geographic analysis of residuals can be used to identify the type and sequence of additional variables for inclusion, either at the same or at more discrete scales of analysis. Residual geographic variation in richness from the two‐variable model displays a geographic pattern unrelated to longitude and latitude. Regional clusters of under‐ and over‐prediction point to macro‐scale variation in topographic relief as a significant factor. When topographic relief is added as a third variable, the explanatory power ( R 2 ) increases by 7 to 12%, and the subsequent pattern of variation in residuals becomes even more unpredictable. What clustering remains points to other macro‐, and meso‐ or micro‐scale variables that need to be considered. Such a top‐down, trans‐scalar approach permits systematic and objective development of more complete explanations, while the three‐variable macro‐scale model developed herein is the basis for a powerful research tool for ecologists, biogeographers, conservationists and bio‐climatologists alike.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
O'Brien, E. M., Field, R., & Whittaker, R. J.
Venue
Oikos
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-06
Volume
89
Issue
3
Pages
588-600
ISSN
  • 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0706
OpenAlex
W1970944032
Cited by
282
References
0
FWCI
10.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x
The paper
O'Brien, E. M., Field, R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2000). Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.