The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography
Abstract
Recent studies at the macro‐scale have demonstrated that geographic gradients in the richness of plants, in particular of woody plants such as trees and shrubs, can be viewed as by‐products of water‐energy dynamics. According to this view, they are climatic rather than latitudinal/longitudinal gradients, relating to coincident and predictable variations in planetary surface‐atmosphere thermal dynamics and consequent patterns in biological activity. Previous analyses have shown that a two‐variable model capturing the dynamic relationship between energy (heat/light) and water (rainfall) accounts for most of the variation in woody plant richness across southern Africa at species, genus, and family levels. Here we move towards a more complete explanation, while demonstrating how geographic analysis of residuals can be used to identify the type and sequence of additional variables for inclusion, either at the same or at more discrete scales of analysis. Residual geographic variation in richness from the two‐variable model displays a geographic pattern unrelated to longitude and latitude. Regional clusters of under‐ and over‐prediction point to macro‐scale variation in topographic relief as a significant factor. When topographic relief is added as a third variable, the explanatory power ( R 2 ) increases by 7 to 12%, and the subsequent pattern of variation in residuals becomes even more unpredictable. What clustering remains points to other macro‐, and meso‐ or micro‐scale variables that need to be considered. Such a top‐down, trans‐scalar approach permits systematic and objective development of more complete explanations, while the three‐variable macro‐scale model developed herein is the basis for a powerful research tool for ecologists, biogeographers, conservationists and bio‐climatologists alike.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Homogenization of plant diversity, composition, and structure in North American urban yards
Pearse, W. D., Cavender‐Bares, J., Hobbie, S. E., Avolio, M. L., Bettez, N., Roy Chowdhury, R., Darling, L. E., Groffman, P. M., Grove, J. M., Hall, S. J., et al. (2018) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.2105 · Cited by 130
The pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: a test with savanna termite assemblages
Davies, A. B., Eggleton, P., van Rensburg, B. J., & Parr, C. L. (2012) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02107.x · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, E. M., Field, R., & Whittaker, R. J.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-06
- Volume
- 89
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 588-600
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W1970944032
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x
- The paper
- O'Brien, E. M., Field, R., & Whittaker, R. J. (2000). Climatic gradients in woody plant (tree and shrub) diversity: water‐energy dynamics, residual variation, and topography. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890319.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.