The pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis: a test with savanna termite assemblages
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. Fire is an important disturbance in African savannas where it is generally assumed that high levels of pyrodiversity (variation in aspects of the fire regime) are necessary to maintain high levels of biodiversity. There is, however, little empirical evidence in support of this hypothesis for animals. Furthermore, the relationship between pyrodiversity and biodiversity may vary with different savanna types, shaped by mean annual precipitation. 2. We made use of a long‐term burning experiment to investigate the effect of interactions between precipitation and pyrodiversity on biodiversity. We sampled termites (major ecosystem engineers in savannas) within experimental plots involving a range of fire seasons and frequencies. Sampling was conducted in three distinct savanna types along a rainfall gradient in South Africa. We explored how termite diversity varied with mean annual precipitation and whether faunal responses to fire regimes varied with rainfall. Termites were sampled comprehensively during the wet season using cellulose baits and active searching in order to sample a variety of functional groups. 3. Assemblages differed significantly across savanna types with higher levels of diversity in the wetter site using the active searching method. Diversity was lowest at the most arid site but certain feeding groups (FGs) peaked in the savanna with intermediate rainfall. Differences between these savannas are attributed to broad underlying changes in net primary productivity and temperature, with mammalian herbivores thought to generate a peak in diversity of some faunal groups at the intermediate savanna through their role in facilitating nutrient cycling. 4. Overall, termites were highly resistant to fire in all savanna types with little difference between fire regimes (season and frequency), but assemblage composition and some FGs were affected by burning. Differences between fire regimes were more pronounced with increasing rainfall. These differences are likely to be linked to changes in vegetation structure caused by fire, which are more significant in wet savannas. 5. Synthesis and applications. Our findings, along with those for other insect taxa, indicate limited support for the pyrodiversity–biodiversity hypothesis; this suggests that, at least for invertebrates, management regimes can be flexible, although more caution is advisable in wetter savannas.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The influence of fires on biodiversity may depend on trophic levels.
“and the influence of fires on biodiversity may depend on trophic levels (Davies, Eggleton, Rensburg, & Parr, 2012;Maravalhas & Vasconcelos, 2014).”
From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Davies et al., 2012
Cites
Burning the seasonal mosaic: preventative burning strategies in the wooded savanna of southern Mali
Laris, P. (2002) · Human Ecology · doi:10.1023/a:1015685529180 · Cited by 251 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Patch mosaic burning is also often used for safety purposes as it is thought to prevent larger, uncontrolled fires later in the season (Laris 2002; Keeley & Fotheringham 2001).”
BackgroundHistoric Fire Regime in Southern California Shrublands
Keeley, J. E., & Fotheringham, C. J. (2001) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.2001.00097.x · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers
McLauchlan, K. K., Higuera, P. E., Miesel, J., Rogers, B. M., Schweitzer, J., Shuman, J. K., Tepley, A. J., Varner, J. M., Veblen, T. T., Adalsteinsson, S. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2745.13403 · Cited by 729 · see citing works
Pyrodiversity is the coupling of biodiversity and fire regimes in food webs
Bowman, D. M. J. S., Perry, G. L. W., Higgins, S. I., Johnson, C. N., Fuhlendorf, S. D., & Murphy, B. P. (2016) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2015.0169 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
- Authors
- Davies, A. B., Eggleton, P., van Rensburg, B. J., & Parr, C. L.
- Affiliations
- University of Pretoria (ZA)
- Natural History Museum (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Davies, Andrew B.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-02-24
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 422-430
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1841544921
- Cited by
- 106
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Ecology (publishedVersion)
- UpSpace Institutional Repository (University of Pretoria) (submittedVersion)
- SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- savanna fire regimes, termite diversity, mean annual precipitation, ecosystem engineers, fire resistance, net primary productivity, herbivorous mammals, nutrient cycling, savanna management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review