The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review
Abstract
The diversity of responses of individual grasses to defoliation created a controversy about 15 years ago, which still needs clarification. We quantitatively assessed the evidence of defoliation effects on individual grass growth, addressing two main questions: 1) what is the average and variability of the effect of defoliation on plant growth? and 2) what are the associated conditions accounting for the diversity of effects? Regarding the first question, the results showed a negative overall effect of defoliation on plant growth and substantial variability in the defoliation responses of different plant components. There was an intermediate negative effect on total production (which included clipped‐off biomass), a large negative effect on final live biomass at harvest, and a minimal effect on root biomass. Regarding the second question (conditions accounting for the diversity of effects), defoliation intensity had no effect on the response to defoliation, but both time for recovery from the last defoliation and the period of time between defoliation events significantly decreased the negative effect of defoliation. Nitrogen availability also altered the effect of defoliation, as plants grown at highest nitrogen levels were more negatively affected by clipping than plants with no supplementary addition of nitrogen. These results indicate that the magnitude of defoliation response by an individual plant differs among plant compartments and this response is modulated by other factors, such as time for recovery after defoliation, and nutrient availability. In general, the effect of defoliation on individual plant production was more negative than reported effects of grazing on ecosystem primary production.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
Metcalfe, A., & Rosenthal, R. (1994) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2348600 · Cited by 4,249
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,642
STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META-ANALYSES
Gurevitch, J., & Hedges, L. V. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1142:siiema]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,081
Does Herbivory Benefit Plants? A Review of the Evidence
Belsky, A. J. (1986) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284531 · Cited by 1,018
The Handbook of Research Synthesis
Ziegel, E. R., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. (1995) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1269651 · Cited by 927
A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments
Gurevitch, J., Morrow, L. L., Wallace, A., & Walsh, J. S. (1992) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/285428 · Cited by 865
Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength
Paine, R. T. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/355073a0 · Cited by 735
Ecosystems of Disturbed Ground
Anderson, R. C., & Walker, L. R. (2000) · Journal of Vegetation Science · doi:10.2307/3246595 · Cited by 663
Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D. (1995) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4 · Cited by 570
Cited by
Schönbach, P., Wan, H., Gierus, M., Bai, Y., Müller, K., Lin, L., Susenbeth, A., & Taube, F. (2011) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-010-0366-6 · Cited by 381
Suppression of sorghum axillary bud outgrowth by shade, phyB and defoliation signalling pathways
KEBROM, T. H., BRUTNELL, T. P., & FINLAYSON, S. A. (2009) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02050.x · Cited by 139
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferraro, D. O., & Oesterheld, M.
- Venue
- Oikos
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 125-133
- ISSN
- 0030-1299 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0706
- OpenAlex
- W2136129986
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 44
- FWCI
- 20.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980113.x
- The paper
- Ferraro, D. O., & Oesterheld, M. (2002). Effect of defoliation on grass growth. A quantitative review. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.980113.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.