Cited by 571Meta-analysis and systematic reviewsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesResearch Data Management Practices

Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution

Arnqvist, Göran, Wooster, David·1995·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

The growing number of empirical studies performed in ecology and evolution creates a need for quantitative summaries of research domains to generate higher-order conclusions about general trends and patterns. Recent developments In meta-analysis (the area of statistics that is designed for summarizing and analyzing multiple independent studies) have opened up new and exciting possibilities. Unlike more traditional qualitative and narrative reviews, meta-analysis allows powerful quantitative analyses of the magnitude of effects and has a high degree of objectivity because it is based on a standardized set of statistical procedures. The first pioneering applications in ecology and evolution demonstrate that meta-analysis is both tractable and powerful.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)89073-4

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Open science practices have been strongly advocated in recent years to facilitate full access to scientific data in an unbiased manner.

    “Open science practices have been strongly advocated particularly in the past few years to facilitate full access to scientific data, particularly in an unbiased manner 79 .”

    From Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis (2018) · cites this paper as [79]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnqvist, G., & Wooster, D.
Affiliations
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • University of Kentucky (US)
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
236-240
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2162582079
Cited by
570
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
5.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
Keywords
meta-analysis, ecology, evolution, effect size, research trends

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review