Cited by 696Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesIsotope Analysis in EcologySoil and Environmental Studies

The impact of manuring on nitrogen isotope ratios in cereals: archaeological implications for reconstruction of diet and crop management practices

Bogaard, A., Heaton, T.H.E., Poulton, P., Merbach, I.·2007·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jas.2006.04.009

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Southwest Asia by 7000 B.C. and Europe by 5000 B.C., the early presence of intensive land-use technologies has been confirmed by stable nitrogen isotope ratios in preserved crop grains, indicating that manures were used to sustain intensive cultivation near settlements.

    “In Southwest Asia (by 7000 B.C.) and Europe (by 5000 B.C.), the early presence of intensive land-use technologies has been confirmed by stable nitrogen isotope ratios in preserved crop grains, indicating that manures were used to sustain intensive cultivation near settlements (90, 91).”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [90]

  • Agricultural practices including tillage, manuring, burning, composting, and use of chemical fertilizers alter the chemistry and isotopic composition of nitrogen and phosphorus in soils and plant and animal remains.

    “Agricultural practices, including tillage, manuring, burning, composting, and use of chemical fertilizers, alter the chemistry and isotopic composition of nitrogen and phosphorus in soils and plant and animal remains (85, 89, 90).”

    From Used planet: a global history (2013) · cites this paper as [90]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bogaard, A., Heaton, T. H. E., Poulton, P., & Merbach, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • Rothamsted Research (GB)
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE)
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
335-343
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2030161835
Cited by
696
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 49 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 35
FWCI
8.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
nitrogen isotope ratios, manure application, cereals, chaff, charred cereal grains, archaeobotany, human diet reconstruction, crop management, long-term fertilization experiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review