The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Regulation of Lamp2a Levels in the Lysosomal Membrane
Open accessAbstract
The selective degradation of cytosolic proteins in lysosomes by chaperone‐mediated autophagy depends, at least in part, on the levels of a substrate receptor at the lysosomal membrane. We have previously identified this receptor as the lysosome‐associated membrane protein type 2a (lamp2a) and showed that levels of lamp2a at the lysosomal membrane directly correlate with the activity of the proteolytic pathway. Here we show that levels of lamp2a at the lysosomal membrane are mainly controlled by changes in its half‐life and its distribution between the lysosomal membrane and the matrix. The lysosomal degradation of lamp2a requires the combined action of at least two different proteolytic activities at the lysosomal membrane. Lamp2a is released from the membrane by the action of these proteases, and then the truncated lamp2a is rapidly degraded within the lysosomal matrix. Membrane degradation of lamp2a is a regulated process that is inhibited in the presence of substrates for chaperone‐mediated autophagy and under conditions that activate that type of autophagy. Uptake of substrate proteins also results in transport of some intact lamp2a from the lysosomal membrane into the matrix. This fraction of lamp2a can be reinserted back into the lysosomal membrane. The traffic of lamp2a through the lysosomal matrix is not mediated by vesicles, and lamp2a reinsertion requires the lysosomal membrane potential and protein components of the lysosomal membrane. The distribution of lamp2a between the lysosomal membrane and matrix is a dynamic process that contributes to the regulation of lysosomal membrane levels of lamp2a and consequently to the activity of the chaperone‐mediated autophagic pathway.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Carlsson, S. R., Roth, J., Piller, F., & Fukuda, M. (1988) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)37369-1 · Cited by 345
Cited by
An Overview of Autophagy: Morphology, Mechanism, and Regulation
Parzych, K. R., & Klionsky, D. J. (2014) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2013.5371 · Cited by 2,521
The coming of age of chaperone-mediated autophagy
Kaushik, S., & Cuervo, A. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0001-6 · Cited by 1,407
Self-citationMolecular Mechanisms and Potential Therapeutical Targets in Huntington's Disease
Zuccato, C., Valenza, M., & Cattaneo, E. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2009 · Cited by 848
Lysosomal storage disorders: The cellular impact of lysosomal dysfunction
Platt, F. M., Boland, B., & van der Spoel, A. C. (2012) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201208152 · Cited by 689
Age-related decline in chaperone-mediated autophagy
Cuervo, A. M., & Dice, J. F. (2000) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m002102200 · Cited by 665
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuervo, A. M., & Dice, J. F.
- Venue
- Traffic
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 570-583
- ISSN
- 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
- 1600-0854
- OpenAlex
- W2168445378
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.