Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 169

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention, Degradation, and Aggregation of Olfactory G‐Protein Coupled Receptors

Lu, Min, Echeverri, Fernando, Moyer, Bryan D.·2003·Traffic

Abstract

The mammalian olfactory G‐protein coupled receptor family is comprised of hundreds of proteins that mediate odorant binding and initiate signal transduction cascades leading to the sensation of smell. However, efforts to functionally express olfactory receptors and identify specific odorant ligand–olfactory receptor interactions have been severely impeded by poor olfactory receptor surface expression in heterologous systems. Therefore, experiments were performed to elucidate the cellular mechanism(s) responsible for inefficient olfactory receptor cell surface expression. We determined that the mouse odorant receptors mI7 and mOREG are not selected for export from the ER and therefore are not detectable at the Golgi apparatus or plasma membrane. Specifically, olfactory receptors interact with the ER chaperone calnexin, are excluded from ER export sites, do not accumulate in ER–Golgi transport intermediates at 15 °C, and contain endoglycosidase H‐sensitive oligosaccharides, consistent with olfactory receptor exclusion from post‐ER compartments. A labile pool of ER‐retained olfactory receptors are post‐translationally modified by polyubiquitination and targeted for degradation by the proteasome. In addition, olfactory receptors are sequestered into ER aggregates that are degraded by autophagy. Collectively, these data demonstrate that poor surface expression of olfactory receptors in heterologous cells is attributable to a combination of ER retention due to inefficient folding and poor coupling to ER export machinery, aggregation, and degradation via both proteasomal and autophagic pathways Plasmids .

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00097.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 169

Metadata

Authors
Lu, M., Echeverri, F., & Moyer, B. D.
Venue
Traffic
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-05-12
Volume
4
Issue
6
Pages
416-433
ISSN
  • 1398-9219 (ISSN-L)
  • 1600-0854
OpenAlex
W1599561836
Cited by
169
References
6
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention, Degradation, and Aggregation of Olfactory G‐Protein Coupled Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00097.x
The paper
Lu, M., Echeverri, F., & Moyer, B. D. (2003). Endoplasmic Reticulum Retention, Degradation, and Aggregation of Olfactory G‐Protein Coupled Receptors. Traffic. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0854.2003.00097.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.