The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. The Results of the First Year
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: On 4 January 1999, the Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) was implemented within the Eurotransplant kidney allocation scheme. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Kidneys obtained from donors aged over 65 years of age (65+) were allocated to a selected group of nonimmunized 65+ patients undergoing their first transplant. All transplants were performed locally to minimize cold-ischemic time. All transplants performed with kidneys from elderly donors that were allocated via ESP (ESP group) were compared to transplants performed with similar kidneys allocated via the standard renal allocation system (control group). Initial kidney function and 1-year graft outcome were assessed. RESULTS: In 1999, 227 ESP and 102 control transplants were performed. The duration of cold-ischemic time was 12 and 19 h for the ESP and control groups, respectively. No rejection episodes occurred in 60% and 67% of the ESP patients and controls, respectively, while a direct kidney function was observed in 59% of ESP and 49% of control patients. The 1-year graft survival rates, censoring for graft losses due to deaths in patients with functioning grafts, were 86% and 79%, respectively. CONCLUSION: An old-for-old renal allocation algorithm can be successful provided that risk factors, such as cold-ischemic time, are reduced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Expanded criteria donors for kidney transplantation
Metzger, R. A., Delmonico, F. L., Feng, S., Port, F. K., Wynn, J. J., & Merion, R. M. (2003) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1034/j.1600-6143.3.s4.11.x · Cited by 686
Frei, U., Noeldeke, J., Machold-Fabrizii, V., Arbogast, H., Margreiter, R., Fricke, L., Voiculescu, A., Kliem, V., Ebel, H., Albert, U., et al. (2008) · American Journal of Transplantation · doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.02014.x · Cited by 358
Self-citationMarkers of cellular senescence in zero hour biopsies predict outcome in renal transplantation
Koppelstaetter, C., Schratzberger, G., Perco, P., Hofer, J., Mark, W., Öllinger, R., Oberbauer, R., Schwarz, C., Mitterbauer, C., Kainz, A., et al. (2008) · Aging Cell · doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2008.00398.x · Cited by 124
Metadata
- Authors
- Smits, J. M. A., Persijn, G. G., Van Houwelingen, H. C., Claas, F. H. J., & Frei, U.
- Venue
- American Journal of Transplantation
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2002-08
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 664-670
- ISSN
- 1600-6135 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2038046807
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. The Results of the First Year. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20713.x
- The paper
- Smits, J. M. A., Persijn, G. G., Van Houwelingen, H. C., Claas, F. H. J., & Frei, U. (2002). Evaluation of the Eurotransplant Senior Program. The Results of the First Year. American Journal of Transplantation. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20713.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.