The greening of relationship science.
Abstract
This article briefly outlines the salutary implications for psychology of the development of a science of interpersonal relationships, which has emerged as multidisciplinary in nature and international in scope. Discussed are the potentials of relationship science: to unite psychological scholars with other social, behavioral, and biological scientists; to help integrate many subdisciplines within psychology; to bridge the chasm between researcher and practitioner; to extend knowledge of human behavior to people's daily lives and natural surroundings; and to inform issues of national concern. The realization of these potentials, however, requires transcendence of psychologists' traditional individualistic orientation, as well as more research on the impact of affect on cognition and research on the impact of relationships' exterior environments on their interior dynamics.
Cited by (9)
- Socioeconomic status, family processes, and individual developmentConger, Rand D., Conger, Katherine J., Martin, Monica J. · 2010 · Journal of Marriage and Family
- Co–Rumination in the Friendships of Girls and BoysRose, Amanda J · 2002 · Child Development
- The Relationship Context of Human Behavior and DevelopmentReis, Harry T., Collins, W. Andrew, Berscheid, Ellen · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
- Social baseline theory: The role of social proximity in emotion and economy of actionBeckes, Lane, Coan, James A. · 2011 · Social and Personality Psychology Compass
- Competence in early adult romantic relationships: A developmental perspective on family influences.Conger, Rand D., Cui, Ming, Bryant, Chalandra M., Elder, Glen H. · 2000 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The greening of relationship science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0003-066x.54.4.260
- The paper
- Berscheid, E. (1999). The greening of relationship science. American Psychologist. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.54.4.260
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.