Cited by 274Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentEarly Childhood Education and Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of inhibition during childhood: Evidence for situational specificity and a two-factor model.

Asendorpf, Jens B.·1990·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

The inhibition of 99 children was observed from the start of preschool through Grade 1 in multiple settings: adult strangers, dyadic play with unfamiliar and familiar peers, and regular free play in class. A multisetting-multimethod-multioccasion analysis revealed (a) a high longitudinal stability of inhibition toward strangers and a medium stability of inhibition in class, (b) a decreasing consistency between inhibition in class and inhibition toward strangers, (c) an increasing consistency between inhibition in class and being ignored or rejected by classmates, and (d) no detrimental effect of children's inhibition toward strangers on their dyadic play with familiar peers. These results are discussed in terms of a 2-factor model of inhibition that is linked to Gray's concept of the behavioral inhibition system. It is assumed that both unfamiliarity and social-evaluative concerns contribute to individual differences in inhibition in childhood. When children encounter a new environment, a novel object, or a stranger, they often become inhibited. They are hesitant in exploring the environment or the object, or their social behavior is inhibited, resulting in long latencies of responding; in the presence of an unfamiliar peer, children tend to regress to less mature forms of play (Asendorpf, in press; Doyle, Connolly, & Rivest, 1980).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.721

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Asendorpf, J. B.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
Asendorpf, Jens B.
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
1990-09
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
721-730
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2040298793
Cited by
274
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
inhibition, behavioral inhibition system, Gray, situational specificity, two-factor model, children, stranger anxiety, peer rejection, novelty, free play, longitudinal stability, individual differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of inhibition during childhood: Evidence for situational specificity and a two-factor model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.721
The paper
Asendorpf, J. B. (1990). Development of inhibition during childhood: Evidence for situational specificity and a two-factor model. Developmental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.26.5.721