Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior.

Charles A. O’Reilly, Jennifer A. Chatman·1986·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Previous research on organizational commitment has typically not focused on underlying dimensions of psychological attachment to organization. Results of two studies using university employees (N = 82) and students (N = 162) suggest that psychological attachment may be predicated on compliance, identification, and internalization (e.g., Kelman, 19S8). Identification and internalization are positively related to prosocial behaviors and negatively related to turnover. Internalization is predictive of financial donations to a fund-raising campaign. Overall, results suggest importance of clearly specifying underlying dimensions of commitment using notions of psychological attachment and various forms such attachment can take. In past decade, construct of organizational commitment has occupied a prominent place in organizational behavior research (Mowday, Porter, & Steers, 1982; Salancik, 1977; Staw & Ross, 1978). Unfortunately, as Morrow (1983, p. 486) has pointed out, the growth in commitment related concepts has not been accompanied by a careful segmentation of commitment's theoretical domain in terms of intended meaning of each concept or concepts' relationships among each other. By her count, there are over 25 commitment-related concepts and measures. Staw (1977), for instance, has noted that value of commitment as a separate construct distinct from other psychological concepts such as motivation, involvement, or behavioral intention remains to be demonstrated. What is needed are theoretical and operational definitions that clearly differentiate commitment and its components from other re

Cited by (58)

  1. A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment
    Meyer, John P., Allen, Natalie J. · 1991 · Human Resource Management Review
  2. A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature: Suggestions, Practices, and Recommendations for Organizational Research
    Vandenberg, Robert J., Lance, Charles E. · 2000 · Organizational Research Methods
  3. Self‐determination theory and work motivation
    Gagné, Marylène, Deci, Edward L. · 2005 · Journal of Organizational Behavior
  4. A review and meta-analysis of the antecedents, correlates, and consequences of organizational commitment.
    Mathieu, John E., Zajac, Dennis M. · 1990 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Organizational citizenship behaviors: a critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research
    Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Paine, Julie Beth, Bachrach, Daniel G. · 2000 · Journal of Management

See all 4,072

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.492
The paper
O’Reilly, C. A., & Chatman, J. A. (1986). Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.71.3.492

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.