Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect.

Crampton, Suzanne M., Wagner, John A.·1994·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Analysis of 42,934 correlations published in 581 articles not only revealed general evidence that self-report methods have produced percept-percept inflation in microresearch on organizations but also suggested that this effect is diminished when 1 or both covariates are demographic variables. Further analysis of a subsample of 11,710 correlations indicated that percept-percept inflation has influenced research on particular bivariate relationships but has not had the broad, comprehensive effects envisioned by critics. These findings challenge the validity of general condemnations of self-report methods, suggesting instead that domain-specific investigations are required to determine which areas of research are especially susceptible to percept-percept effects

Cites (6)

  1. Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
    Podsakoff, Philip M., Organ, Dennis W. · 1986 · Journal of Management
  2. The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.
    Rosenthal, Robert · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
    Kirk, Roger · 2013
  4. Methods of Meta-Analysis
    Hunter, John, Schmidt, Frank · 2004
  5. Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: reality or artifact?
    Williams, Larry J., Cote, Joseph A., Buckley, M. Ronald · 1989 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  6. Relations of job characteristics from multiple data sources with employee affect, absence, turnover intentions, and health.
    Spector, Paul E., Jex, Steve M. · 1991 · Journal of Applied Psychology

Show all 6 references

Cited by (46)

  1. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies
    Podsakoff, Philip M., MacKenzie, Scott B., Lee, Jeong-Yeon, Podsakoff, Nathan P. · 2003 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs
    Lindell, Michael K., Whitney, David J. · 2001 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. Common methods variance detection in business research
    Fuller, Christie M., Simmering, Marcia J., Atinc, Guclu, Atinc, Yasemin, Babin, Barry J. · 2016 · Journal of Business Research
  4. Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?
    Spector, Paul E. · 2006 · Organizational Research Methods
  5. Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry
    Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., Tabrizi, Behnam N. · 1995 · Administrative Science Quarterly

See all 1,224

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.79.1.67
The paper
Crampton, S. M., & Wagner, J. A. (1994). Percept-percept inflation in microorganizational research: An investigation of prevalence and effect. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.79.1.67

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.