A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
Abstract
Research on gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment informs an ongoing legal debate regarding the use of a reasonable person standard instead of a reasonable woman standard to evaluate sexual harassment claims. The authors report a meta-analysis of 62 studies of gender differences in harassment perceptions. An earlier quantitative review combined all types of social-sexual behaviors for a single meta-analysis; the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the magnitude of the female-male difference varies by type of behavior. An overall standardized mean difference of 0.30 was found, suggesting that women perceive a broader range of social-sexual behaviors as harassing. However, the meta-analysis also found that the female-male difference was larger for behaviors that involve hostile work environment harassment, derogatory attitudes toward women, dating pressure, or physical sexual contact than sexual propositions or sexual coercion.
Cites (50)
- Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral SciencesMuller, Keith · 1989 · Technometrics
- Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences1990 · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
- Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research FindingsSchmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 2015
- Introduction to Classical and Modern Test TheoryLinda M. Crocker, James J. Algina · 1986
- Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.Metcalfe, Andrew, Rosenthal, R. · 1994 · The Statistician
- Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.Raudenbush, Stephen W., Hunter, John E., Schmidt, Frank L. · 1991 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
- Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advancesFitzgerald, Louise F., Gelfand, Michele J., Drasgow, Fritz · 1995 · Basic and Applied Social Psychology
- The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplaceFitzgerald, Louise F, Shullman, Sandra L, Bailey, Nancy, Richards, Margaret, Swecker, Janice, Gold, Yael, Ormerod, Mimi, Weitzman, Lauren · 1988 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
- Sex and the Workplace.DeWine, Sue, Gutek, Barbara A. · 1987 · Administrative Science Quarterly
- Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual HarassmentJensen, Inger W., Gutek, Barbara A. · 1982 · Journal of Social Issues
Cited by (9)
- A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENTWILLNESS, CHELSEA R., STEEL, PIERS, LEE, KIBEOM · 2007 · Personnel Psychology
- Workplace Sexual Harassment 30 Years on: A Review of the LiteratureMcDonald, Paula · 2012 · International Journal of Management Reviews
- Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender HierarchyBerdahl, Jennifer L. · 2007 · Academy of Management Review
- Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis.Zell, Ethan, Krizan, Zlatan, Teeter, Sabrina R. · 2015 · American Psychologist
- THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVESkarlicki, Daniel P., Kulik, Carol T. · 2004 · Research in Organizational Behavior
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914
- The paper
- Rotundo, M. S., Nguyen, D.-H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.