A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.

Maria Saveria Rotundo, Dung-Hanh Nguyen, Paul R. Sackett·2001·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

Research on gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment informs an ongoing legal debate regarding the use of a reasonable person standard instead of a reasonable woman standard to evaluate sexual harassment claims. The authors report a meta-analysis of 62 studies of gender differences in harassment perceptions. An earlier quantitative review combined all types of social-sexual behaviors for a single meta-analysis; the purpose of this study was to investigate whether the magnitude of the female-male difference varies by type of behavior. An overall standardized mean difference of 0.30 was found, suggesting that women perceive a broader range of social-sexual behaviors as harassing. However, the meta-analysis also found that the female-male difference was larger for behaviors that involve hostile work environment harassment, derogatory attitudes toward women, dating pressure, or physical sexual contact than sexual propositions or sexual coercion.

Cites (50)

  1. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
    Muller, Keith · 1989 · Technometrics
  2. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
    1990 · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
  3. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings
    Schmidt, Frank L., Hunter, John E. · 2015
  4. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory
    Linda M. Crocker, James J. Algina · 1986
  5. Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research.
    Metcalfe, Andrew, Rosenthal, R. · 1994 · The Statistician
  6. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings.
    Raudenbush, Stephen W., Hunter, John E., Schmidt, Frank L. · 1991 · Journal of the American Statistical Association
  7. Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances
    Fitzgerald, Louise F., Gelfand, Michele J., Drasgow, Fritz · 1995 · Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  8. The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace
    Fitzgerald, Louise F, Shullman, Sandra L, Bailey, Nancy, Richards, Margaret, Swecker, Janice, Gold, Yael, Ormerod, Mimi, Weitzman, Lauren · 1988 · Journal of Vocational Behavior
  9. Sex and the Workplace.
    DeWine, Sue, Gutek, Barbara A. · 1987 · Administrative Science Quarterly
  10. Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual Harassment
    Jensen, Inger W., Gutek, Barbara A. · 1982 · Journal of Social Issues

Show all 50 references

Cited by (9)

  1. A META‐ANALYSIS OF THE ANTECEDENTS AND CONSEQUENCES OF WORKPLACE SEXUAL HARASSMENT
    WILLNESS, CHELSEA R., STEEL, PIERS, LEE, KIBEOM · 2007 · Personnel Psychology
  2. Workplace Sexual Harassment 30 Years on: A Review of the Literature
    McDonald, Paula · 2012 · International Journal of Management Reviews
  3. Harassment Based on Sex: Protecting Social Status in the Context of Gender Hierarchy
    Berdahl, Jennifer L. · 2007 · Academy of Management Review
  4. Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis.
    Zell, Ethan, Krizan, Zlatan, Teeter, Sabrina R. · 2015 · American Psychologist
  5. THIRD-PARTY REACTIONS TO EMPLOYEE (MIS)TREATMENT: A JUSTICE PERSPECTIVE
    Skarlicki, Daniel P., Kulik, Carol T. · 2004 · Research in Organizational Behavior

See all 409

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914
The paper
Rotundo, M. S., Nguyen, D.-H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.