The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual Harassment
Abstract
Although research has investigated the extent to which sexual harassment exists and what people are or are not doing about it, little has been written about the personal attributions made for these behaviors by either those who have or those who have not been sexually harassed. Research on rape and the assignment of responsiblity for a rape may be useful as a base from which to generalize about sexual harassment and the various ways in which victims and viewers respond to it. This study consists of data from an initial survey investigating the occurrence of sexual harassment at the workplace and follow‐up interviews with female workers who reported in the initial survey having been sexually harassed. The research focused on the application of attribution theory in four areas: 1) sex differences in assignment of responsibility for sexual harassment, 2) effects of having experienced sexual harassment on assignment of responsibility, 3) self‐blame in cases of sexual harassment and its affective and work‐related effects, 4) the role of sex‐role beliefs on assignment of responsibility to self and others. One of the stronger findings of the study concerned the role of sex‐role beliefs. Women who have traditional sex‐role beliefs are more likely to blame themselves and other victims for being sexually harassed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead.
Lerner, M. J., & Miller, D. T. (1978) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030 · Cited by 1,687
Cited by
Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model.
Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.82.4.578 · Cited by 929
Grubb, A., & Turner, E. (2012) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.06.002 · Cited by 620
No safe haven: Male violence against women at home, at work, and in the community.
Koss, M. P., Goodman, L. A., Browne, A., Fitzgerald, L. F., Keita, G. P., & Russo, N. F. (1994) · doi:10.1037/10156-000 · Cited by 617
Children's Perceptions of Discrimination: A Developmental Model
Spears Brown, C., & Bigler, R. S. (2005) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00862.x · Cited by 532
A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment.
Rotundo, M. S., Nguyen, D.-H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037//0021-9010.86.5.914 · Cited by 409
Metadata
- Authors
- Jensen, I. W., & Gutek, B. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1982-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 121-136
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2171528386
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual Harassment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01914.x
- The paper
- Jensen, I. W., & Gutek, B. A. (1982). Attributions and Assignment of Responsibility in Sexual Harassment. Journal of Social Issues. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1982.tb01914.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.