Social desirability scales: More substance than style.

McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T.·1983·Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Abstract

Many psychologists still regard correlations with social desirability (SD) scales as evidence of the invalidity of measures, despite 20 years of research showing that this interpretation is usually unjustified. Although items or scales may be characterized as high or low in SD, there is little evidence that individuals differentially respond to this property when completing self-report questionnaires under normal instructional conditions. In an attempt to separate substance from style in SD scales, self-reports from 215 adult men and women were compared to the external criterion of spouse ratings on a range of personality traits in the domains of neuroticism, extraversion, and openness to experience. When self-reports were corrected using scores from the Eysenck Personality Inventory Lie scale and the Marlowe-Crowne SD scale, validity coefficients decreased, rather than increased, in most cases. Both scales were shown to be substantively related to neuroticism and, to a lesser degree, to extraversion and closedness. These results suggest that correlations with SD scales should be given substantive rather than artifactual interpretations and that the widespread practice of correcting scores for lying, defensiveness, or SD should be questioned.

Cites (1)

  1. Assessing social support: The Social Support Questionnaire.
    Sarason, Irwin G., Levine, Henry M., Basham, Robert B., Sarason, Barbara R. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 1 references

Cited by (51)

  1. Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.
    McCrae, Robert R., Costa, Paul T. · 1987 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: the NEO personality inventory
    Costa, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R. · 1992 · Psychological Assessment
  3. Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review
    Nederhof, Anton J. · 1985 · European Journal of Social Psychology
  4. Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
    Diener, Ed · 1994 · Social Indicators Research
  5. Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being.
    Steel, Piers, Schmidt, Joseph, Shultz, Jonas · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 748

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social desirability scales: More substance than style. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-006x.51.6.882
The paper
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1983). Social desirability scales: More substance than style. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006x.51.6.882

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.