Individual differences in student cheating.

Abstract

The incidence and causes of cheating were investigated using a questionnaire, consisting of 21 cheating behaviors, which was distributed to students at an English university. Respondents were asked to indicate, confidentially, which of the behaviors they had engaged in. Reported cheating was widespread and some types of cheating (e.g., on coursework) were more common than others. Reported cheating was more common in men than women; more common with less able students than more able ones; more common in younger students than mature ones; and more common in science and technology students than those in other disciplines. It is suggested that students' motivation, in particular whether they are studying to learn rather than simply to obtain good grades, is a major factor in explaining these differences. The results also indicate that cheating consists of a number of different types of behavior rather than being a unitary concept.

Cites (27)

1. Motivational processes affecting learning.
   Dweck, Carol S. · 1986 · American Psychologist
2. Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance.
   Nicholls, John G. · 1984 · Psychological Review
3. The Academic Motivation Scale: A Measure of Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Amotivation in Education
   Vallerand, Robert J., Pelletier, Luc G., Blais, Marc R., Briere, Nathalie M., Senecal, Caroline, Vallieres, Evelyne F. · 1992 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
4. Advances in Motivation and Achievement
   2014 · Motivational Interventions
5. ASSOCIATION OF SPECIFIC OVERT BEHAVIOR PATTERN WITH BLOOD AND CARDIOVASCULAR FINDINGS: BLOOD CHOLESTEROL LEVEL, BLOOD CLOTTING TIME, INCIDENCE OF ARCUS SENILIS, AND CLINICAL CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE
   Friedman, Meyer · 1959 · Journal of the American Medical Association
6. Sex differences in empathy and related capacities.
   Nancy Eisenberg, Randy Lennon · 1983 · Psychological Bulletin
7. College cheating: Immaturity, lack of commitment, and the neutralizing attitude
   Haines, Valerie J., Diekhoff, George M., LaBeff, Emily E., Clark, Robert E. · 1986 · Research in Higher Education
8. Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques, and Punishments
   Davis, Stephen F., Grover, Cathy A., Becker, Angela H., McGregor, Loretta N. · 1992 · Teaching of Psychology
9. Current trends in college cheating
   Baird, John S. · 1980 · Psychology in the Schools
10. Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why?
    Franklyn-Stokes, Arlene, Newstead, Stephen E. · 1995 · Studies in Higher Education

Show all 27 references

Cited by (21)

1. Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Published Research: Common Errors and Some Comment on Improved Practice
   Henson, Robin K., Roberts, J. Kyle · 2006 · Educational and Psychological Measurement
2. Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment
   Ashworth, Peter, Bannister, Philip, Thorne, Pauline, Students on the Qualitative Researc · 1997 · Studies in Higher Education
3. Motivational perspectives on student cheating: Toward an integrated model of academic dishonesty
   Murdock, Tamera B., Anderman, Eric M. · 2006 · Educational Psychologist
4. Measuring plagiarism: researching what students do, not what they say they do
   Walker, John · 2010 · Studies in Higher Education
5. How Common Is Commercial Contract Cheating in Higher Education and Is It Increasing? A Systematic Review
   Newton, Philip M. · 2018 · Frontiers in Education

See all 477