CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 653Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perception of out-group homogeneity and levels of social categorization: Memory for the subordinate attributes of in-group and out-group members.

Park, Bernadette, Rothbart, Myron·1982·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Four experiments were conducted to explore the hypothesis that in-group members perceive their own group as more variegated and complex than do out-group members (the out-group homogeneity principle). The first three experiments were designed to demonstrate this effect in a symmetric manner for both parties of the in-group-out-group dichotomy, and the fourth experiment tested one particular theoretical account of this phenomenon. In Experiments 1 and 2, men and women subjects estimated the proportion of men or women who would endorse a variety of personality/attitude items. The items were constructed to vary on the dimensions of stereotypic meaning (masculinity-femininity) and social desirability (favorable-unfavorable). It was predicted and found that outgroup members viewed a group as endorsing more stereotypic and fewer counterstereotypic items than, did in-group members. These findings were interpreted as support for the out-group homogeneity principle, and it was argued that since this effect was general across items varying in social desirability, the phenomenon was independent of traditional ethnocentrism effects. Experiment 3 asked members of three campus sororities to directly judge the degree of intragroup similarity for their own group and two other groups. Again, each group judged its own members to be more dissimilar to one another than did out-group judges. In Experiment 4 a theory was proposed suggesting that different levels of social categorization are used to encode in-group and out-group members' behavior and that this process could account for the perception of out-group homogeneity. It was predicted and found that men and women were more likely to remember the subordinate attributes of an in-group member than of an out-group member, which provides some evidence for the theoretical model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 653

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Park, B., & Rothbart, M.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
ORCID
Park, Bernadette
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Published
1982-06
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
1051-1068
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
DOI
10.1037/0022-3514.42.6.1051
OpenAlex
W2109596025
Cited by
653
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 16
FWCI
37.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
social categorization, stereotyping, social desirability, gender stereotypes, ethnocentrism, sorority members

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review