Cited by 6,618Decision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPsychological and Temporal Perspectives ResearchLanguage, Metaphor, and Cognition

Construal-level theory of psychological distance.

Open access
Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira·2010·Psychological Review

Abstract

People are capable of thinking about the future, the past, remote locations, another person's perspective, and counterfactual alternatives. Without denying the uniqueness of each process, it is proposed that they constitute different forms of traversing psychological distance. Psychological distance is egocentric: Its reference point is the self in the here and now, and the different ways in which an object might be removed from that point-in time, in space, in social distance, and in hypotheticality-constitute different distance dimensions. Transcending the self in the here and now entails mental construal, and the farther removed an object is from direct experience, the higher (more abstract) the level of construal of that object. Supporting this analysis, research shows (a) that the various distances are cognitively related to each other, (b) that they similarly influence and are influenced by level of mental construal, and (c) that they similarly affect prediction, preference, and action.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0018963

Cites

195 of 195 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Abstract construal allows individuals to transcend the particularities of the present situation and act according to their global concerns.

    “Abstract construal allows individuals to transcend the particularities of the present situation and act according to their global concerns (Trope & Liberman, 2010).”

    From The mnemonic mover: Nostalgia regulates avoidance and approach motivation (2014) · cites this paper as Trope & Liberman, 2010

  • Power and affiliation are forms of psychological distance.

    “Power and affiliation are forms of psychological distance.”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Trope and Liberman, 2010

  • The construal level theory suggests that common cognitive mechanisms process different types of psychological distance, whether temporal, spatial, or social.

    “The construal level theory (Trope and Liberman, 2010) suggests that common cognitive mechanisms process different types of psychological distance, whether temporal, spatial, or social.”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Trope and Liberman, 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Boring EG Langfeld HS Weld HP 1939 Introduction to psychology New York, NY Wiley
  2. Fiske ST Taylor SE 1991 Social cognition 2 New York, NY McGraw-Hill
  3. Gray JA 2000 The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of the septohippocampal system Oxford, England Oxford University Press
  4. Kray L Gonzalez R 1999 Differential weighting in choice versus advice: I’ll do this, you do that Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 12 201 217
  5. Liberman N Förster J 2009 Distancing from experienced self: How global versus local perception affects estimation of psychological distance Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 97 203 216 19634971
  6. Liviatan I Trope Y Liberman N 2008 The effect of similarity on mental construal Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 1256 1269 19352440 PMC2665912
  7. Rachlin H Brown J Cross D 2000 Discounting in judgments of delay and probability Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13 145 159
  8. Wilson TD Gilbert DT 2003 Affective forecasting Zanna MP Advances in experimental social psychology 35 345 411 San Diego, CA Academic Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N.
Affiliations
Tel Aviv University (IL)
Venue
Psychological Review
Published
2010
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
440-463
ISSN
  • 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1471
OpenAlex
W2089457241
Cited by
6,618
References
195
Citations by year
2026: 736 · 2025: 727 · 2024: 592 · 2023: 569 · 2022: 553 · 2021: 511 · 2020: 474 · 2019: 540 · 2018: 370 · 2017: 326 · 2016: 290 · 2015: 267 · 2014: 224 · 2013: 191 · 2012: 143
FWCI
98.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (59030-06A1)
  • Israeli Science Fund (1346/04)
  • Binational Science Fund (2007247)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
Keywords
construal level theory, psychological distance, mental construal, time distance, spatial distance, social distance, hypotheticality, counterfactual reasoning, prediction, preferences, action
MeSH terms
Distance Perception, Humans, Psychological Theory, Psychophysics, Psychological Distance, Space Perception, Visual Perception, Vocabulary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review