The discrepant repressor: Differentiation between low anxiety, high anxiety, and repression of anxiety by autonomic-facial-verbal patterns of behavior.

Abstract

This study examined the notion that personality questionnaires can be used to predict different styles of coping with anxiety as expressed by individual differences in patterns of autonomic, verbal, and nonverbal reactions. In line with earlier modifications of the repression-sensitization concept, the Taylor Manifest Anxiety Scale (MAS) and the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (SDS) were used to select four groups of 12 subjects each from a pool of 206 male students in Germany: low-anxious subjects (low MAS, low SDS), repressors (low MAS, high SDS), high-anxious subjects (high MAS, low SDS), and defensive high-anxious subjects (high MAS, high SDS). Several measures of autonomic arousal, facial activity, and self-reported affect were obtained during a potentially anxiety-arousing free-association task and during a number of control conditions, including a funny film. Significant differences in baseline-corrected heart rate and self-reported anxiety as well as rated facial anxiety all indicated that repressors exhibited a discrepancy between low self-reported anxiety and high heart rate and facial anxiety; low-anxious subjects reported an intermediate level of anxiety, although they showed low heart rate and facial anxiety; high-anxious subjects had consistently high values on all three variables; and the defensive high-anxious group showed an intermediate level of anxious responding. These group differences were specific to the task of freely associating to phrases of mixed (sexual, aggressive, neutral) content (but not to other experimental situations) and to self-reported anxiety (but not to other self-rated emotions or task difficult), indicating that they reflect individual differences in coping with anxiety.

Cites (24)

1. Statistical principles in experimental design.
   Winer, B. J. · 1962 · McGraw-Hill Book Company
2. Personality and Assessment
   Madison, Peter, Mischel, Walter · 1968 · The American Journal of Psychology
3. A personality scale of manifest anxiety
   Taylor, Janet A. · 1953 · The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology
4. Untitled work
   1972 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
5. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence
   Freud, Anna · 2018 · Routledge eBooks
6. Behavior: The Control of Perception
   Kuhn, Alfred, Powers, William T. · 1975 · Contemporary Sociology
7. Progress in experimental personality research
   Winifred B. Maher, Brendan A. Maher · 1964 · Academic Press eBooks
8. The Approval Motive: Studies in Evaluative Dependence
   Edwards, Allen L., Crowne, Douglas P., Marlowe, David · 1965 · The American Journal of Psychology
9. Low-anxious, high-anxious, and repressive coping styles: Psychometric patterns and behavioral and physiological responses to stress.
   Weinberger, Daniel A., Schwartz, Gary E., Davidson, Richard J. · 1979 · Journal of Abnormal Psychology
10. The Ego and the Mechanisms of Defence
    d, Freu · 1949 · The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Show all 24 references

Cited by (19)

1. Assessing Subjective Well-Being: Progress and Opportunities
   Diener, Ed · 1994 · Social Indicators Research
2. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation
   Endler, Norman S., Parker, James D. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Emotion Regulation: Past, Present, Future
   Gross, James J. · 1999 · Cognition and Emotion
4. Chronic psychosocial factors and acute physiological responses to laboratory-induced stress in healthy populations: a quantitative review of 30 years of investigations
   Chida, Yoichi, Hamer, Mark · 2008 · Psychological Bulletin
5. Distress and Restraint as Superordinate Dimensions of Self‐Reported Adjustment: A Typological Perspective
   Weinberger, Daniel A., Schwartz, Gary E. · 1990 · Journal of Personality

See all 276