Social comparison in adjustment to breast cancer.

Abstract

We investigated four theoretical perspectives concerning the role of social comparison (Festinger, 1954) in coping with a threatening event in a sample of breast cancer patients. According to the supercoper perspective, personal contact with comparison others is often unavailable to patients, and contact with media "supercopers"--fellow victims presented as adjusting very smoothly--may make patients feel inadequate by comparison. According to the similarity perspective, patients select comparison targets who are similar to themselves because those comparisons should be the most informative. The upward comparison perspective is predictive of comparisons to relatively advantaged or superior individuals. The downward comparison perspective leads to the prediction that under conditions of threat, individuals make comparisons to people who are inferior or less fortunate in order to enhance their self-esteem. We interviewed 78 breast cancer patients, and results of both closed-ended questions and spontaneously offered comparisons yielded a preponderance of downward comparisons. The results point to the value of using naturalistic methods for studying comparisons, and suggest a more active and cognitive role for social comparison than is usually portrayed.

Cites (23)

1. A theory of social comparison processes
   Festinger, Leon · 1954 · Human Relations
2. The structure of coping
   Pearlin, Leonard I., Schooler, Carmi · 1978 · Journal of Health and Social Behavior
3. Adjustment to threatening events: A theory of cognitive adaptation.
   Shelley E. Taylor · 1983 · American Psychologist
4. Short Marital-Adjustment and Prediction Tests: Their Reliability and Validity
   Locke, Harvey J., Wallace, Karl M. · 1959 · Marriage and Family Living
5. Downward comparison principles in social psychology
   Wills, Thomas A. · 1981 · Psychological Bulletin
6. The Psychology of affiliation
   Beech, H.R. · 1963 · Journal of Psychosomatic Research
7. Social Comparison Processes: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives.
   Pettigrew, Thomas F., Suls., Jerry M., Miller, Richard L. · 1979 · Contemporary Sociology
8. Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer.
   Taylor, Shelley E., Lichtman, Rosemary R., Wood, Joanne V. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
9. Human Helplessness: Theory and Applications
   Judy Garber, Martin E. P. Seligman · 1980
10. It Could Be Worse: Selective Evaluation as a Response to Victimization
    Taylor, Shelley E., Wood, Joanne V., Lichtman, Rosemary R. · 1983 · Journal of Social Issues

Show all 23 references

Cited by (46)

1. Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress.
   Diener, Ed, Suh, Eunkook M., Lucas, Richard E., Smith, Heidi L. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Illusion and well‐being: A social psychological perspective on mental health
   Taylor, Shelley E., Brown, Jonathon D. · 1988 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment.
   Kahneman, Daniel, Frederick, Shane · 2002 · Heuristics and Biases
4. The Dynamic Self-Concept: A Social Psychological Perspective
   Markus, H, Wurf, E · 1987 · Annual Review of Psychology
5. Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view.
   Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F. · 1990 · Psychological Review

See all 632