Coping in stressful episodes: The role of individual differences, environmental factors, and situational characteristics.

Abstract

Theoretical models emphasize the importance of person and environmental variables in stress and coping processes. This article examines individual differences (extraversion and neuroticism), environmental factors (social support and work demand), and situational characteristics (type of stressful episode and its perceived importance) as predictors of three self-report measures of coping (general coping, direct coping, and suppression) derived from the Ways of Coping Questionnaire. The data analyzed were collected from 135 first-year female student nurses. Individual differences were assessed prior to exposure to the ward environment, and information about stressful episodes was obtained during the initial period of nursing practice. Multiple regression analyses showed that individual differences and environmental and situational factors were significant predictors of the coping scores and that patterns of main and interactive effects were different for each type of coping. For direct coping and suppression, predicted interactions across person, environmental, and situational variables contributed significantly to the explained variance. Curvilinear interactions between work demand and neuroticism were significant for both direct coping and suppression; interactions of social support and extraversion with perceived importance predicted direct coping; and interactions between neuroticism and extraversion and between work demand and importance predicted suppression. These findings are discussed in relation to current substantive and methodological issues in the study of coping and adaptation.

Cites (62)

1. “Stress: appraisal and coping,”
   Folkman, Susan · 2013 · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine
2. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis
   Cohen, Sheldon, Wills, Thomas A. · 1985 · Psychological Bulletin
3. Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign
   Karasek, Robert A. · 1979 · Administrative Science Quarterly
4. The structure of coping
   Pearlin, Leonard I., Schooler, Carmi · 1978 · Journal of Health and Social Behavior
5. Psychological stress and the coping process
   Richard S. Lazarus · 1966 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
6. If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination
   Folkman, Susan, Lazarus, Richard S. · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. Work Stress and Social Support.
   Deutsch, Steven, House, James S. · 1983 · Contemporary Sociology
8. Positive Events and Social Supports as Buffers of Life Change Stress 1
   Cohen, Sheldon, Hoberman, Harry M. · 1983 · Journal of Applied Social Psychology
9. The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events
   Billings, Andrew G., Moos, Rudolf H. · 1981 · Journal of Behavioral Medicine
10. Handbook of Stress: Theoretical and Clinical Aspects
    Leo Goldberger, Shelomo Breznitz · 1993 · Medical Entomology and Zoology

Show all 62 references

Cited by (18)

1. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
   Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F., Weintraub, Jagdish K. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
2. Multidimensional assessment of coping: a critical evaluation
   Endler, Norman S., Parker, James D. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
3. Relations between personality and coping: A meta-analysis.
   Connor-Smith, Jennifer K., Flachsbart, Celeste · 2007 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
4. Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review
   McVicar, Andrew · 2003 · Journal of Advanced Nursing
5. Examining the protective effects of mindfulness training on working memory capacity and affective experience.
   Jha, Amishi P., Stanley, Elizabeth A., Kiyonaga, Anastasia, Wong, Ling, Gelfand, Lois · 2010 · Emotion

See all 398