Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat.

Suzanne M. Miller·1987·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Subjects were divided into information seekers (high monitors)/information avoiders (low monitors) and distractors (high blunters)/nondistractors (low blunters) on the basis of their scores on a self-report scale to measure coping styles, the Miller Behavioral Style Scale (MBSS). In Experiment 1, subjects were faced with a physically aversive event (the prospect of electric shock). High monitors and low blunters chose to seek out information about its nature and onset whereas low monitors and high blunters chose to distract themselves. This effect was strongest with the blunting dimension. High monitoring and low blunting were also accompanied by sustained high anxiety and arousal. In contrast, low monitors and high blunters were able to relax themselves over time. In Experiment 2, subjects worked on a series of tests that presumably predicted success in college. They could attend as often as they wished to a light that signaled how well they were performing. Results showed that coping-style scores accurately predicted informational strategy, particularly with the monitoring dimension: High monitors tended to look at the light whereas low monitors tended to ignore it. Thus the MBSS measure of coping styles appears to be a valid instrument for predicting behavioral strategies in response to both physical and psychological stressors. The theoretical and practical implications of these findings are discussed.

Cites (3)

  1. If it changes it must be a process: study of emotion and coping during three stages of a college examination
    Folkman, Susan, Lazarus, Richard S. · 1985 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality
    Mischel, Walter · 1973 · Psychological Review
  3. Coping with Impending Stress: Psychophysiological and Cognitive Correlates of Choice
    Miller, Suzanne M. · 1979 · Psychophysiology

Show all 3 references

Cited by (53)

  1. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
    Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F., Weintraub, Jagdish K. · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The emerging field of emotion regulation: an integrative review
    Gross, James J. · 1998 · Review of General Psychology
  3. Positive psychological states and coping with severe stress
    Folkman, Susan · 1997 · Social Science & Medicine
  4. Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs, and Behavior
    2016 · Studies in Information
  5. Situational coping and coping dispositions in a stressful transaction.
    Carver, Charles S., Scheier, Michael F. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 1,139

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345
The paper
Miller, S. M. (1987). Monitoring and blunting: Validation of a questionnaire to assess styles of information seeking under threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.52.2.345

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.