Cited by 89Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesStress Responses and Cortisol

Coping with Impending Stress: Psychophysiological and Cognitive Correlates of Choice

Miller, Suzanne M.·1979·Psychophysiology

Abstract

ABSTRACT When faced with threat of shock, individuals were allowed to choose to distract themselves by listening to Muzak or to monitor cues predicting shock. Preference for monitoring information or for distraction was investigated concurrently with electrodermal and subjective arousal. Subjects preferred to monitor rather than distract themselves, particularly when shock was avoidable. Even when shock was not avoidable, some preference for information was found. Arousal, physiological and subjective, was consistently higher under monitoring conditions, and this was most pronounced when shock was unavoidable. Higher arousal accompanying information is contrary to the three major theories explaining choice of predictable threat, and the outline of a new hypothesis was proposed to account for these data.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1979.tb01523.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Accommodation may involve an increased readiness to disregard or blunt out problem-related cues when the person believes nothing can be done.

    “This may also involve an increased readiness to disregard or ''blunt out'' (Miller, 1979) problem-related cues in situations in which the person believes that nothing can be done about the problem.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, S. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Miller, Suzanne M.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1979-11
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
572-581
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2085594520
Cited by
89
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
threat anticipation, subjective arousal, Muzak, shock avoidance, cognitive appraisal
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Arousal, Choice Behavior, Electroshock, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Stress, Physiological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review