Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding.

Delroy L. Paulhus, Douglas B. Reid·1991·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

One research tradition has distinguished self-deception, the tendency to give favorably biased but honestly held self-descriptions impression management, the tendency to give favorable selfdescriptions to others. A 2nd tradition has distinguished enhancement, the claiming of positive attributes, from denial, the repudiation of negative attributes. The 2 distinctions were evaluated jointly in 3 studies. Factor analyses showed that impression management items (both enhancement and denial) loaded together. Self-deception items split up: Enhancement items formed a 2nd factor, whereas denial items fell closer to the impression management factor. Of the 4 types, self-deceptive enhancement best predicted adjustment. These results clarify the constructs of enhancement and denial: The critical distinction is not simply one of keying direction but whether the item content refers to a positive or negative attribute.

Cites (7)

  1. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
    Rosenberg, Morris · 1965
  2. Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.
    Davis, Mark H. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
    Steiger, James H. · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
    Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management Theory
    Greenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon · 1986 · Public Self and Private Self
  6. Public Self and Private Self
    1986
  7. Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality.
    Trapnell, Paul D., Wiggins, Jerry S. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 7 references

Cited by (31)

  1. The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation
    Tennant, Ruth, Hiller, Louise, Fishwick, Ruth, Platt, Stephen, Joseph, Stephen, Weich, Scott, Parkinson, Jane, Secker, Jenny, Stewart-Brown, Sarah · 2007 · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  2. Measures of emotion: A review
    Mauss, Iris B., Robinson, Michael D. · 2009 · Cognition and Emotion
  3. The Other “Authoritarian Personality”
    Altemeyer, Bob · 1998 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
  4. An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.
    Connelly, Brian S., Ones, Deniz S. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating
    Schmitt, David P. · 2005 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences

See all 823

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.307
The paper
Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.307

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.