Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding.
Abstract
One research tradition has distinguished self-deception, the tendency to give favorably biased but honestly held self-descriptions impression management, the tendency to give favorable selfdescriptions to others. A 2nd tradition has distinguished enhancement, the claiming of positive attributes, from denial, the repudiation of negative attributes. The 2 distinctions were evaluated jointly in 3 studies. Factor analyses showed that impression management items (both enhancement and denial) loaded together. Self-deception items split up: Enhancement items formed a 2nd factor, whereas denial items fell closer to the impression management factor. Of the 4 types, self-deceptive enhancement best predicted adjustment. These results clarify the constructs of enhancement and denial: The critical distinction is not simply one of keying direction but whether the item content refers to a positive or negative attribute.
Cites (7)
- Society and the Adolescent Self-ImageRosenberg, Morris · 1965
- Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach.Davis, Mark H. · 1983 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrixSteiger, James H. · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
- Two-component models of socially desirable responding.Paulhus, Delroy L. · 1984 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- The Causes and Consequences of a Need for Self-Esteem: A Terror Management TheoryGreenberg, Jeff, Pyszczynski, Tom, Solomon, Sheldon · 1986 · Public Self and Private Self
- Public Self and Private Self1986
- Extension of the Interpersonal Adjective Scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality.Trapnell, Paul D., Wiggins, Jerry S. · 1990 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (31)
- The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validationTennant, Ruth, Hiller, Louise, Fishwick, Ruth, Platt, Stephen, Joseph, Stephen, Weich, Scott, Parkinson, Jane, Secker, Jenny, Stewart-Brown, Sarah · 2007 · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Measures of emotion: A reviewMauss, Iris B., Robinson, Michael D. · 2009 · Cognition and Emotion
- The Other “Authoritarian Personality”Altemeyer, Bob · 1998 · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology
- An other perspective on personality: Meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity.Connelly, Brian S., Ones, Deniz S. · 2010 · Psychological Bulletin
- Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: A 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human matingSchmitt, David P. · 2005 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.307
- The paper
- Paulhus, D. L., & Reid, D. B. (1991). Enhancement and denial in socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.60.2.307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.