Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect.

Van Lange, Paul A. M., Kuhlman, D. Michael·1994·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This research evaluates the might vs. morality effect (Liebrand, Jansen, Rijken, & Suhre, 1986) by examining whether the manipulation of the perception of partner's honesty and intelligence interacts with the observer's own social value orientation to influence the latter's expectations regarding partner cooperation and own cooperation in a social dilemma. Results reveal that greater cooperation was expected from an honest partner than from a dishonest partner and that this effect was stronger for prosocial Ss than for individualists and competitors. Conversely, individualists and competitors expected greater cooperation from an unintelligent partner than from an intelligent partner, whereas prosocial Ss did not expect differences between these partners. Similar findings were obtained for own cooperation, although social value orientations did not interact with partner intelligence.

Cites (5)

  1. Tests for comparing elements of a correlation matrix
    Steiger, James H. · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
  2. The relation of empathy to prosocial and related behaviors
    Eisenberg, Nancy, Miller, Paul A. · 1987 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Theory and research concerning social comparisons of personal attributes
    Wood, Joanne V. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
  4. Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.
    Skowronski, John J., Carlston, Donal E. · 1989 · Psychological Bulletin
  5. A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
    Reeder, Glenn D., Brewer, Marilynn B. · 1979 · Psychological Review

Show all 5 references

Cited by (16)

  1. Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships
    Rusbult, Caryl E., Van Lange, Paul A. M. · 2003 · Annual Review of Psychology
  2. The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientation.
    Van Lange, Paul A. M. · 1999 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Development of prosocial, individualistic, and competitive orientations: theory and preliminary evidence
    Van Lange, Paul A. M., De Bruin, Ellen M. N., Otten, Wilma, Joireman, Jeffrey A. · 1997 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  4. Motivated Information Processing in Group Judgment and Decision Making
    De Dreu, Carsten K. W., Nijstad, Bernard A., van Knippenberg, Daan · 2008 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
  5. Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.
    Thielmann, Isabel, Spadaro, Giuliana, Balliet, Daniel · 2020 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 430

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.67.1.126
The paper
Van Lange, P. A. M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (1994). Social value orientations and impressions of partner's honesty and intelligence: A test of the might versus morality effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.1.126

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.