Cited by 1,961Mental Health via WritingPersonality Traits and PsychologyAuthorship Attribution and Profiling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference

Pennebaker, James W., King, Laura A.·1999·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Can language use reflect personality style? Studies examined the reliability, factor structure, and validity of written language using a word-based, computerized text analysis program. Daily diaries from 15 substance abuse inpatients, daily writing assignments from 35 students, and journal abstracts from 40 social psychologists demonstrated good internal consistency for over 36 language dimensions. Analyses of the best 15 language dimensions from essays by 838 students yielded 4 factors that replicated across written samples from another 381 students. Finally, linguistic profiles from writing samples were compared with Thematic Apperception Test coding, self-reports, and behavioral measures from 79 students and with self-reports of a 5-factor measure and health markers from more than 1,200 students. Despite modest effect sizes, the data suggest that linguistic style is an independent and meaningful way of exploring personality.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,961

Metadata

Authors
Pennebaker, J. W., & King, L. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Southern Methodist University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1999
Volume
77
Issue
6
Pages
1296-1312
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W1972820248
Cited by
1,961
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 128 · 2022: 121 · 2021: 141 · 2020: 155 · 2019: 132 · 2018: 134 · 2017: 90 · 2016: 95 · 2015: 69 · 2014: 101 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 71
FWCI
12.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH052391, MH52391, MH54142)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Keywords
language style, personality, individual differences, written language, text analysis, computational text analysis, factor structure, reliability statistics, validity, Thematic Apperception Test, health indicators, students
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Linguistics, Male, Middle Aged, Personality, Psychological Theory, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review