When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers.
Abstract
To examine whether powerful people fail to individuate the less powerful, the authors assigned participants to either a high-power or low-power role for a computer E-mail role play. In 3 studies, participants in the high-power role made decisions and determined the outcomes of interactions; low-power role players had no power and relied on high-power targets for outcome decisions. Studies I and 2 found that high-power perceivers better individuated low-power targets. Study 3 demonstrated that high-power role players' superior judgment can be impaired by including a task that directs their responsibility toward organizational rather than interpersonal concerns. In all, results suggest that the effect of power on social judgment may be more complex and multifaceted than has previously been acknowledged.
Cites (3)
- Accounting for the effects of accountability.Lerner, Jennifer S., Tetlock, Philip E. · 1999 · Psychological Bulletin
- Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping.Taylor, Shelley E., Fiske, Susan T., Etcoff, Nancy L., Ruderman, Audrey J. · 1978 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
- Prophecies of power: Motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation.Copeland, John T. · 1994 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Cited by (16)
- Construal-level theory of psychological distance.Trope, Yaacov, Liberman, Nira · 2010 · Psychological Review
- 8 Social Hierarchy: The Self‐Reinforcing Nature of Power and StatusMagee, Joe C., Galinsky, Adam D. · 2008 · Academy of Management Annals
- The social distance theory of powerMagee, Joe C., Smith, Pamela K. · 2013 · Personality and Social Psychology Review
- Power, Distress, and Compassion: Turning a Blind Eye to the Suffering of Othersvan Kleef, Gerben A., Oveis, Christopher, van der Löwe, Ilmo, LuoKogan, Aleksandr, Goetz, Jennifer, Keltner, Dacher · 2008 · Psychological Science
- Differentiating the effects of status and power: A justice perspective.Blader, Steven L., Chen, Ya-Ru · 2012 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.549
- The paper
- Overbeck, J. R., & Park, B. (2001). When power does not corrupt: Superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.4.549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.