How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test.

Brendl, C. Miguel, Markman, Arthur B., Messner, Claude·2001·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

There has been significant interest in indirect measures of attitudes like the Implicit Association Test (IAT), presumably because of the possibility of uncovering implicit prejudices. The authors derived a set of qualitative predictions for people's performance in the IAT on the basis of random walk models. These were supported in 3 experiments comparing clearly positive or negative categories to nonwords. They also provided evidence that participants shift their response criterion when doing the IAT. Because of these criterion shifts, a response pattern in the IAT can have multiple causes. Thus, it is not possible to infer a single cause (such as prejudice) from IAT results. A surprising additional result was that nonwords were treated as though they were evaluated more negatively than obviously negative items like insects, suggesting that low familiarity items may generate the pattern of data previously interpreted as evidence for implicit prejudice.

Cites (3)

  1. Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure
    Zajonc, Robert B. · 1968 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias
    Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, Jack L, Thaler, Richard H · 1991 · Journal of Economic Perspectives
  3. A spreading activation theory of memory.
    Anderson, John R. · 1983 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Show all 3 references

Cited by (16)

  1. Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm.
    Greenwald, Anthony G., Nosek, Brian A., Banaji, Mahzarin R. · 2003 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
    Gawronski, Bertram, Bodenhausen, Galen V. · 2006 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. Untitled work
    2003 · 10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145225
  4. The Single Category Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit social cognition.
    Karpinski, Andrew, Steinman, Ross B. · 2006 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  5. Imagining stereotypes away: The moderation of implicit stereotypes through mental imagery.
    Irene V. Blair, Jennifer E. Ma, Alison P. Lenton · 2001 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

See all 220

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.760
The paper
Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.760

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.