Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach.

Kleinmuntz, Benjamin·1990·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This review begins with a discussion of Meehl's (1957) query regarding when to use one's head (i.e., intuition) instead of the formula (i.e., statistical or mechanical procedure) for clinical prediction. It then describes the controversy that ensued and analyzes the complexity and contemporary relevance of the question itself. Going beyond clinical inference, it identifies select cognitive biases and constraints that cause decision errors, and proposes remedial correctives. Given that the evidence shows cognition to be flawed, the article discusses the linear regression, Bayesian, signal detection, and computer approaches as possible decision aids. Their cost-benefit trade-offs, when used either alone or as complements to one another, are examined and evaluated. The critique concludes with a note of cautious optimism regarding the formula's future role as a decision aid and offers several interim solutions.

Cites (203)

  1. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk
    Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1988 · Decision, Probability and Utility
  2. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
    Tversky, Amos, Kahneman, Daniel · 1975 · Utility, Probability, and Human Decision Making
  3. A BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF RATIONAL CHOICE
    Simon, Herbert A. · 1955 · The Quarterly Journal of Economics
  4. Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
    Nisbett, Richard E., Wilson, Timothy D. · 1977 · Psychological Review
  5. Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems
    Swets, John A. · 1988 · Science
  6. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.
    Tsoukias, Alexis, Keeney, Ralph L., Raiffa, Howard · 1994 · The Journal of the Operational Research Society
  7. Human Problem Solving.
    Axten, Nick, Newell, Allen, Simon, Herbert A. · 1973 · Contemporary Sociology
  8. FOUNDATIONS OF STATISTICS
    2001 · Empirical Direction in Design and Analysis
  9. Human Problem Solving
    Allen Newell · 1972
  10. Rational choice and the structure of the environment.
    Simon, H. A. · 1956 · Psychological Review

Show all 203 references

Cited by (23)

  1. Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment
    Logg, Jennifer M., Minson, Julia A., Moore, Don A. · 2019 · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
  2. Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: the clinical -statistical controversy
    Grove, William M., Meehl, Paul E. · 1996 · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
  3. Behavioral Decision Research: A Constructive Processing Perspective
    Payne, John W., Bettman, James R., Johnson, Eric J. · 1992 · Annual Review of Psychology
  4. Principles of Forecasting: A Handbook for Researchers and Practitioners
    2001 · International Series in Operations Research & Management Science
  5. A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making
    Burton, Jason W., Stein, Mari‐Klara, Jensen, Tina Blegind · 2020 · Journal of Behavioral Decision Making

See all 437

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.107.3.296
The paper
Kleinmuntz, B. (1990). Why we still use our heads instead of formulas: Toward an integrative approach. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.3.296

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.