Representing sources of error in the common-factor model: Implications for theory and practice.

Abstract

In the traditional presentation of the common-factor model, measured variables are represented as exact linear combinations of common and unique factors. From the perspective that no mathematical model will fit real-world phenomena perfectly, it is suggested that this representation is problematic. It is not consistent with the phenomena it is intended to model, and it does not provide an adequate basis for understanding some issues inherent in factor analysis. An alternative representation of the model that incorporates a «lack-of-fit» term into the initial equation for the measured variables is proposed. Subsequent derivation of the covariance form of the model in the population and the sample yields a framework that alloys for differentiation of various sources of error that arise in applications of the model. These developments provide a basis for study of some important issues such as model definition, parameter estimation, and sample size

Cited by (14)

1. Sample size in factor analysis.
   MacCallum, Robert C., Widaman, Keith F., Zhang, Shaobo, Hong, Sehee · 1999 · Psychological Methods
2. Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
   Meredith, William · 1993 · Psychometrika
3. Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire–II: A Revised Measure of Psychological Inflexibility and Experiential Avoidance
   Bond, Frank W., Hayes, Steven C., Baer, Ruth A., Carpenter, Kenneth M., Guenole, Nigel, Orcutt, Holly K., Waltz, Tom, Zettle, Robert D. · 2011 · Behavior Therapy
4. The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models
   Reise, Steven P. · 2012 · Multivariate Behavioral Research
5. A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
   Block, Jack · 1995 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 234