Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis.

Shepperd, James A.·1993·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

This article presents a framework derived from expectancy theory for organizing the research on productivity loss among individuals combining their efforts into a common pool (i.e., the research on social loafing, free riding, and the sucker effect). Lost productivity is characterized as a problem of low motivation arising when individuals perceive no value to contributing, perceive no contingency between their contributions and achieving a desirable outcome, or perceive the costs of contributing to be excessive. Three broad categories of solutions, corresponding to each of the 3 sources of low productivity, are discussed: (a) providing incentives for contributing, (b) making contributions indispensable, and (c) decreasing the cost of contributing. Each of these solutions is examined, and directions for future research and the application of this framework to social dilemmas are discussed. For close to a century, psychologists and other social scientists have been interested in performance in groups. Traditionally, the topic of group performance has been dominated by social facilitation: the process whereby the presence of others enhances the performance of well-learned, dominant behaviors yet impairs the performance of novel, nondominant behaviors (Zajonc, 1965). The study of social facilitation can be traced back to an investigation by Triplett in 1898. Triplett demonstrated that children turned a fishing reel faster if they worked against a live competitor than if they worked alone. In the 9 decades since the initial demonstration by Triplett, hundreds of studies have investigated social facilitation, and numerous theories have been proposed to account for the phe

Cites (3)

  1. “The Need for Cognition.”
    Cacioppo, John T., Petty, Richard E. · 1982 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. The hidden costs of rewards
    Deci, Edward L. · 1976 · Organizational Dynamics
  3. Social loafing and group evaluation
    Harkins, Stephen G., Szymanski, Kate · 1989 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Show all 3 references

Cited by (14)

  1. Social loafing: a meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
    Karau, Steven J., Williams, Kipling D. · 1993 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  2. Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel
    Hertel, Guido, Niedner, Sven, Herrmann, Stefanie · 2003 · Research Policy
  3. 2. Public Goods: A Survey of Experimental Research
    Ledyard, John O. · 1995 · The Handbook of Experimental Economics
  4. Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis
    Lou, Yiping, Abrami, Philip C., d’Apollonia, Sylvia · 2001 · Review of Educational Research
  5. Measuring cost: The forgotten component of expectancy-value theory
    Flake, Jessica Kay, Barron, Kenneth E., Hulleman, Christopher, McCoach, Betsy D., Welsh, Megan E. · 2015 · Contemporary Educational Psychology

See all 423

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.67
The paper
Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity loss in performance groups: A motivation analysis. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.113.1.67

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.