Cited by 721Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducation and Technology IntegrationLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences

Small Group and Individual Learning with Technology: A Meta-Analysis

Lou, Yiping, Abrami, Philip C., d’Apollonia, Sylvia·2001·Review of Educational Research

Abstract

This study quantitatively synthesized the empirical research on the effects of social context (i.e., small group versus individual learning) when students learn using computer technology. In total, 486 independent findings were extracted from 122 studies involving 11,317 learners. The results indicate that, on average, small group learning had significantly more positive effects than individual learning on student individual achievement (mean ES = + 0.15), group task performance (mean ES = + 0.31), and several process and affective outcomes. However, findings on both individual achievement and group task performance were significantly heterogeneous. Through weighted least squares univariate and multiple regression analyses, we found that variability in each of the two cognitive outcomes could be accounted for by a few technology, task, grouping, and learner characteristics in the studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543071003449

Cites

170 of 170 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., & d’Apollonia, S.
Affiliations
  • Louisiana State University (US)
  • Concordia University (CA)
Venue
Review of Educational Research
Published
2001-09
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
449-521
ISSN
  • 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-1046
OpenAlex
W2144282840
Cited by
721
References
170
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 37 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 38
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Technology Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Keywords
small group learning, individual learning, computer technology in education, social context of learning, academic performance, group task performance, affective learning outcomes, technology-enhanced learning, heterogeneous effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review