Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies.

Mitchell, Sandra K.·1979·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

Research in developmental and educational psychology has come to rely less on conventional psychometric tests and more on records of behavior made by human observers in natural and quasi-natural settings. Three coefficients that purport to reflect the quality of data collected in these observational studies are dis-cussed: the interobserver agreement percentage, the reliability coefficient, and the generalizability coefficient. It is concluded that although high interobserver agreement is desirable in observational studies, high agreement alone is not sufficient to insure the quality of the data that are collected. Evidence of the reliability or generalizability of the data should also be reported. Further ad-vantages of generalizability designs are discussed. Almost everyone engaged in research recog-nizes the need for reliable measuring instru-ments. Reliability is a central topic particu-larly for courses and textbooks concerned with the behavioral sciences. In spite of vary-ing theoretical derivations, its definition is remarkably uniform: A reliable instrument is one with small errors of measurement, one that shows stability, consistency, and depend-ability of scores for individuals on the trait, characteristic, or behavior being assessed. The preparation of this article was supported in

Cites (1)

  1. Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.
    Campbell, Donald T., Fiske, Donald W. · 1959 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 1 references

Cited by (20)

  1. Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1984 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  2. rwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
    James, Lawrence R., Demaree, Robert G., Wolf, Gerrit · 1993 · Journal of Applied Psychology
  3. Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments
    Perreault, William D., Leigh, Laurence E. · 1989 · Journal of Marketing Research
  4. A longitudinal study of joint attention and language development in autistic children
    Mundy, Peter, Sigman, Marian, Kasari, Connie · 1990 · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
  5. Loneliness and friendship in high-functioning children with autism
    Bauminger, Nirit, Kasari, Connie · 2000 · Child Development

See all 445

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.376
The paper
Mitchell, S. K. (1979). Interobserver agreement, reliability, and generalizability of data collected in observational studies. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.376

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.