On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications.

Wells, Gary L., Lindsay, R. C.·1980·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

The criminal justice system's practice of treating eyewitness lineup identifications of suspects as highly informative while treating nonidentifications (i.e., no-choice responses or choices of foi ls) as uninformative is questioned. A Bayesian model of information gain is used to mathematically prove that (a) if an eyewitness identification of a suspect increases the probability that the suspect is the criminal, then a nonidentification must decrease the probability that the suspect is the criminal; and (b) the relative diagnosticity of identifications versus nonidentifications (regarding the probability that the suspect is the criminal) is determined by the probability of obtaining an identification versus nonidentification, with nonidentifications being more diagnostic if they are relatively less frequent than identifications. An application of the Bayesian model to previously published data suggests that greater diagnosticity for nonidentifications than identifications is more than just a theoretical possibili ty; the available data show nonidentifications to be more than one and a half times as diagnostic as identifications regarding the probability that the suspect is the criminal. A breakdown of nonidentifications into two types, eyewitness choices of a lineup foil versus no-choice decisions, suggests that the latter is more informative than the former regarding the probability that the suspect is innocent. The cognitive mechanisms that may be responsible for criminal justice investigators' discounting of nonidentifications are discussed in relation to research on human judgment.

Cites (3)

  1. On the psychology of prediction.
    Kahneman, Daniel, Tversky, Amos · 1973 · Psychological Review
  2. Perseverance in self-perception and social perception: Biased attributional processes in the debriefing paradigm.
    Ross, Lee, Lepper, Mark R., Hubbard, Michael · 1975 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  3. Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.
    Greenwald, Anthony G. · 1975 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 3 references

Cited by (3)

  1. The Science of False Memory
    2005
  2. The Relationship Between Eyewitness Confidence and Identification Accuracy: A New Synthesis
    Wixted, John T., Wells, Gary L. · 2017 · Psychological Science in the Public Interest
  3. Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?
    Lindsay, R. C., Wells, Gary L., Rumpel, Carolyn M. · 1981 · Journal of Applied Psychology

See all 291

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.776
The paper
Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.88.3.776

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.