Can people detect eyewitness-identification accuracy within and across situations?

Abstract

Thefts were staged 108 times for as many witnesses who were subsequently given a photo lineup for identifying the thief. The thefts were staged under conditions designed to yield low (33%), moderate (50%), or high (74%) proportions of correct identifications of the thief. Corroborating past research, the relationship between witnesses' identification accuracy and witnesses' confidence was negligible within conditions. There was no evidence that the confidence-accuracy relationship changed across conditions or that witness confidence changed across theft conditions. A representative sample of 48 witnesses (8 accurate-iden tification and 8 false-identification witnesses from each of the three theft conditions) was cross-examined. Subjects (n = 96) viewing the cross-examinations showed no ability to detect accurate- from false-identification witnesses within conditions as measured by subjects' belief of witnesses. Although subjects changed their rate of belief of witnesses as a function of the theft conditions (62%, 66%, and 77%, respectively), the rate at which subjects discounted witnesses' testimony was insufficient across conditions. Subjects were shown to be especially overbelieving of witnesses when the rate of witness accuracy in that condition was low.

Cites (18)

1. Experimental Design in Psychological Research
   2002 · Foundations of Cognitive Psychology
2. Reconstruction of automobile destruction: An example of the interaction between language and memory
   Loftus, Elizabeth F., Palmer, John C. · 1974 · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
3. Leading questions and the eyewitness report
   Loftus, Elizabeth F · 1975 · Cognitive Psychology
4. The Psychology of Rumor.
   Lee, Alfred McClung, Allport, Gordon W., Postman, Leo · 1948 · American Sociological Review
5. Recognition for faces of own and other race.
   Malpass, Roy S., Kravitz, Jerome · 1969 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
6. Applied eyewitness-testimony research: System variables and estimator variables.
   Gary L. Wells · 1978 · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
7. The American Jury
   Harry Kalven, Hans Zeisel · 1971 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
8. The American Jury.
   Hare, A. Paul, Kalven, Harry, Zeisel, Hans · 1967 · American Sociological Review
9. Accuracy, confidence, and juror perceptions in eyewitness identification.
   Wells, Gary L., Lindsay, R. C., Ferguson, Tamara J. · 1979 · Journal of Applied Psychology
10. On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness nonidentifications.
    Wells, Gary L., Lindsay, R. C. · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin

Show all 18 references

Cited by (9)

1. Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review
   Meissner, Christian A., Brigham, John C. · 2001 · Psychology, Public Policy, and Law
2. The Science of False Memory
   2005
3. "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience.
   Wells, Gary L., Bradfield, Amy L. · 1998 · Journal of Applied Psychology
4. Accounts of the confidence-accuracy relation in recognition memory
   Busey, Thomas A., Tunnicliff, Jennifer, Loftus, Geoffrey R., Loftus, Elizabeth F. · 2000 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
5. Eyewitness memory is still not common sense: Comparing jurors, judges and law enforcement to eyewitness experts
   Benton, Tanja Rapus, Ross, David F., Bradshaw, Emily, Thomas, W. Neil, Bradshaw, Gregory S. · 2006 · Applied Cognitive Psychology

See all 289