Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.
Abstract
This article presents a general set of procedures for comparing the effect sizes of two or more independent studies. The procedures include a method for calculating the approximate significance level for the heterogeneity of effect sizes of studies and a method for calculating the approximate significance level of a contrast among the effect sizes. Although the focus is on effect size as measured by the standardized difference between the means (d) defined as (Mi — M-^/S,\nthe procedures can be applied to any measure of effect size having an estimated variance. This extension is illustrated with effect size measured by the difference between proportions.
Cites (6)
- Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences1990 · Computers, Environment and Urban Systems
- Distribution Theory for Glass's Estimator of Effect Size and Related EstimatorsHedges, Larry V. · 1981 · Journal of Educational Statistics
- Interpersonal expectancy effects: the first 345 studiesRosenthal, Robert, Rubin, Donald B. · 1978 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Estimation of effect size from a series of independent experiments.Larry Vernon Hedges · 1982 · Psychological Bulletin
- Comparing significance levels of independent studies.Robert Rosenthal, Donald B. Rubin · 1979 · Psychological Bulletin
- Tests of differences in p levels as tests of differences in effect sizes.Louis M. Hsu · 1980 · Psychological Bulletin
Cited by (56)
- Fixed-and random-effects models in meta-analysis.Hedges, Larry V., Vevea, Jack L. · 1998 · Psychological Methods
- Parental Involvement and Students' Academic Achievement: A Meta-AnalysisFan, Xitao, Chen, Michael · 2001 · Educational Psychology Review
- Sensitivity and attachment: A meta-analysis on parental antecedents of infant attachmentDe Wolff, Marianne S, van Ijzendoorn, Marinus H · 1997 · Child Development
- A review of MRI findings in schizophreniaShenton, Martha E., Dickey, Chandlee C., Frumin, Melissa, McCarley, Robert W. · 2001 · Schizophrenia Research
- On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: a meta-analysisElfenbein, Hillary Anger, Ambady, Nalini · 2002 · Psychological Bulletin
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0033-2909.92.2.500
- The paper
- Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies. Psychological Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.92.2.500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.