Selective attention: A reevaluation of the implications of negative priming.

Milliken, Bruce, Joordens, Steve, Merikle, Philip M., Seiffert, Adriane E.·1998·Psychological Review
DOI 10.1037//0033-295x.105.2.203

Cited by (8)

  1. The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis.
    Friedman, Naomi P., Miyake, Akira · 2004 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  2. On inhibition/disinhibition in developmental psychopathology: Views from cognitive and personality psychology and a working inhibition taxonomy.
    Nigg, Joel T. · 2000 · Psychological Bulletin
  3. A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity.
    Kane, Michael J., Bleckley, M. Kathryn, Conway, Andrew R. A., Engle, Randall W. · 2001 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General
  4. Working memory and Stroop interference: An individual differences investigation
    Long, Debra L., Prat, Chantel S. · 2002 · Memory & Cognition
  5. Target uncertainty does not lead to more distraction by singletons: Intertrial priming does
    Pinto, Yaïr, Olivers, Christiann L., Theeuwes, Jan · 2005 · Perception & Psychophysics
  6. The myth of ballistic processing: Evidence from Stroop’s paradigm
    Besner, Derek · 2001 · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
  7. Negative Priming with Masked Distractor-Only Prime Trials: Awareness Moderates Negative Priming
    Frings, Christian, Wentura, Dirk · 2005 · Experimental Psychology
  8. Are patients with obsessive–compulsive disorder generally more doubtful? Doubt is warranted!
    Moritz, Steffen, Rietschel, Liz, Jelinek, Lena, Bäuml, Karl-Heinz T. · 2011 · Psychiatry Research

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.