The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.
Abstract
This paper presents a spreading-acti vation theory of human semantic processing, which can be applied to a wide range of recent experimental results. The theory is based on Quillian's theory of semantic memory search and semantic preparation, or priming. In conjunction with this, several of the miscondeptions concerning Qullian's theory are discussed. A number of additional assumptions are proposed for his theory in order to apply it to recent experiments. The present paper shows how the extended theory can account for results of several production experiments by Loftus, Juola and Atkinson's multiple-category experiment, Conrad's sentence-verification experiments, and several categorization experiments on the effect of semantic relatedness and typicality by Holyoak and Glass, Rips, Shoben, and Smith, and Rosch. The paper also provides a critique of the Smith, Shoben, and Rips model for categorization judgments. Some years ago, Quillian1 (1962, 1967) proposed a spreading-acti vation theory of human semantic processing that he tried to implement in computer simulations of memory search (Quillian, 1966) and comprehension (Quillian, 1969). The theory viewed memory search as activation spreading from two or more concept nodes in a semantic network until an intersection was found. The effects of preparation (or priming) in semantic memory were also explained in terms of spreading activation from the node of the primed concept. Rather than a theory to explain data, it was a theory d…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“which posit that human memory retrieval is not a search process, but a propagation of energy. Accessing one concept naturally activates semantically, temporally, or causally linked concepts without explicit prompting.”
From Synapse: Empowering LLM Agents with Episodic-Semantic Memory via Spreading Activation (2026) · cites this paper as Collins and Loftus, 1975
In the citing paper
“Inspired by human semantic memory models (Collins and Loftus, 1975), we implement a dynamic activation process to prioritize information.”
From Synapse: Empowering LLM Agents with Episodic-Semantic Memory via Spreading Activation (2026) · cites this paper as Collins and Loftus, 1975
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(80)90312-6 · Cited by 6,336
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
Kintsch, W., & van Dijk, T. A. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.5.363 · Cited by 5,298
Ratcliff, R. (1978) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.85.2.59 · Cited by 4,513
Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231 · Cited by 3,915
Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60330-5 · Cited by 3,143
Metadata
- Authors
- Collins, A. M., & Loftus, E. F.
- ORCID
- Loftus, Elizabeth F.
- Venue
- Psychological Review
- Published
- 1975-11
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 407-428
- ISSN
- 0033-295X (ISSN-L)
- 1939-1471
- OpenAlex
- W2135255848
- Cited by
- 8,141
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 200 · 2025: 216 · 2024: 190 · 2023: 275 · 2022: 270 · 2021: 264 · 2020: 301 · 2019: 316 · 2018: 260 · 2017: 272 · 2016: 252 · 2015: 312 · 2014: 397 · 2013: 307 · 2012: 288
- FWCI
- 30.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Psychological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- semantic processing, semantic memory, semantic priming, semantic networks, categorization, typicality, semantic relatedness, sentence verification, production experiment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review