A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.

Abstract

A selective review of experiments that can be said to demonstrate the effects of generalization decrement in Pavlovian condition is presented, and it is argued that an adequate theoretical explanation for them is currently not available. This article then develops a theoretical account for the processes of generalization and generalization decrement in Pavlovian conditioning. It assumes that animals represent their environment by a stimulus array in a buffer and that this array in its entirety constitutes the conditioned stimulus. Generalization is then held to occur whenever at least some of the stimuli represented in the array on a test trial are the same as at least some of those represented in the array during training. Specifically, the magnitude of generalization is determined by the proportion of the array occupied by these common stimuli during training compared to the proportion of the array they occupy during testing. By adding to this principle rules concerning excitatory and inhibitory learning, it is proposed, the model can explain all the results that were difficult for its predecessors to account for. A fundamental property of conditioned responding is that it may occur in circumstances that differ from those prevailing during acquisition. This phenomenon is referred to as generalization, and the term generalization decrement is used when this transfer is less than complete. These effects have been revealed with both Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning, using a variety of species and a wide range of conditioned stimuli (CS) and unconditioned stimuli (US). As iar as instrumental conditioning is concerned, a considerable number of studies have been directed at examining the factors that influence the magnitude of generalization from one situation to another (for reviews see Honig & Urcuioli, 1981; Mackintosh, 1974). These results also have been the focus of considerable theoretical analysis. In contrast, much less attention has been paid to the role of generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Only a few studies have been concerned specifically with demonstrating the generalization decrement of a Pavlovian conditioned response (CR) as a result of modifying the properties of the CS (Hofiman & Fleshier, 1961; Hovland, 1937; Moore, 1972; Pavlov, 1927; Siegel, Hearst, George, & O'Neal, 1968). Furthermore, only a few theorists have been specifically concerned with the analysis of these and related effects (Hull, 1943; Pavlov, 1927). An alternative approach has been to show how a particular theoretical analysis of the Pavlovian learning process can be extended to account for generalization and generalization decrement (cf. Rescorla, 1976). The argument presented in this article is based on the premise that an adequate account for the effects of generalization must lie at the core of

Cites (47)

1. A theory of Pavlovian conditioning : Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement
   Robert A. Rescorla · 1972 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
2. Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory.
   Abraham H. Black, William F. Prokasy · 1972 · Appleton-Century-Crofts eBooks
3. Principles of Behavior
   Skinner, B. F., Hull, Clark L. · 1944 · The American Journal of Psychology
4. Context theory of classification learning
   Medin, Douglas L., Schaffer, Marguerite M. · 1978 · Psychological Review
5. A model for Pavlovian learning: Variations in the effectiveness of conditioned but not of unconditioned stimuli.
   Pearce, John M., Hall, Geoffrey · 1980 · Psychological Review
6. A theory of attention: Variations in the associability of stimuli with reinforcement
   Mackintosh, N. J. · 1975 · Psychological Review
7. The Psychology of Animal Learning
   Hill, Winfred F., Mackintosh, N. J. · 1976 · The American Journal of Psychology
8. Perception and the Conditioned Reflex
   Hay, John C., Sokolov, Ye. N. · 1966 · The American Journal of Psychology
9. Handbook of mathematical psychology: I.
   R. Duncan Luce, Robert R. Bush, Eugene Galanter · 1963 · Wiley eBooks
10. Integrative activity of the brain
    Jerzy Konorski · 1967

Show all 47 references

Cited by (31)

1. Context, time, and memory retrieval in the interference paradigms of Pavlovian learning
   Bouton, Mark E. · 1993 · Psychological Bulletin
2. Mechanisms of fear extinction
   Myers, K M, Davis, M · 2007 · Molecular Psychiatry
3. Fear Extinction and Relapse: State of the Art
   Vervliet, Bram, Craske, Michelle G., Hermans, Dirk · 2013 · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
4. Configural association theory and the hippocampal formation: An appraisal and reconfiguration
   Rudy, Jerry W., Sutherland, Robert J. · 1995 · Hippocampus
5. Occasion Setting in Pavlovian Conditioning
   Holland, Peter C. · 1992 · Psychology of Learning and Motivation

See all 1,046