Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance.

Biederman, Irving, Gerhardstein, Peter C.·1993·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Abstract

Five experiments on the effects of changes of depth orientation on (a) priming the naming of briefly flashed familiar objects, (b) matching individual sample volumes (geons), and (c) classifying unfamiliar objects (that could readily be decomposed into an arrangement of distinctive geons) all revealed immediate (i.e., not requiring practice) depth invariance. The results can be understood in terms of 3 conditions derived from a model of object recognition (I. Biederman, 1987; J. E. Hummel & I. Biederman, 1992) that have to be satisfied for immediate depth invariance: (a) that the stimuli be capable of activating viewpoint-invariant (e.g., geon) structural descriptions (GSDs), (b) that the GSDs be distinctive (different) for each stimulus, and (c) that the same GSD be activated in original and tested views. The stimuli used in several recent experiments documenting extraordinary viewpoint dependence violated these conditions.

Cites (36)

  1. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.
    Biederman, Irving · 1987 · Psychological Review
  2. Two cortical visual systems
    Leslie G. Ungerleider · 1982 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  3. Analysis of visual behavior
    David Ingle, Melvyn Alan Goodale, Richard J. W. Mansfield · 1982 · The MIT Press eBooks
  4. Networks for approximation and learning
    Poggio, T., Girosi, F. · 1990 · Proceedings of the IEEE
  5. Memory and cognition
    Walter Kintsch · 1977 · Medical Entomology and Zoology
  6. Image And Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
    Kosslyn, Stephen M. · 1994
  7. Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture
    Treisman, Anne · 1988 · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
  8. Mental Images and Their Transformations
    D., C. P., Shepard, Roger N., Cooper, Lynn A. · 1983 · The American Journal of Psychology
  9. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate
    Stephen M. Kosslyn · 1994
  10. Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition.
    Hummel, John E., Biederman, Irving · 1992 · Psychological Review

Show all 36 references

Cited by (10)

  1. Perceptual symbol systems
    Barsalou, Lawrence W. · 1999 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. Change detection
    Rensink, Ronald A. · 2002 · Annual Review of Psychology
  3. Models of object recognition
    Riesenhuber, Maximilian, Poggio, Tomaso · 2000 · Nature Neuroscience
  4. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits
    Humphreys, Glyn W., Forde, Emer M. E. · 2001 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  5. Systems of Spatial Reference in Human Memory
    Shelton, Amy L., McNamara, Timothy P. · 2001 · Cognitive Psychology

See all 601

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1162
The paper
Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.19.6.1162

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.