Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks.

Wilfried Kunde·2001·Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance

Abstract

This study investigated whether compatibility between responses and their consistent sensorial effects influences performance in manual choice reaction tasks. In Experiment 1 responses to the nonspatial stimulus attribute of color were affected by the correspondence between the location of responses and the location of their visual effects. In Experiment 2, a comparable influence was found with nonspatial responses of varying force and nonspatial response effects of varying auditory intensity. Experiment 3 ruled out the hypothesis that acquired stimulus-effect associations may account for this influence of response-effect compatibility. In sum, the results show that forthcoming response effects influence response selection as if these effects were already sensorially present, suggesting that in line with the classical ideomotor theory, anticipated response effects play a substantial role in response selection.

Cites (4)

  1. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy
    Kornblum, Sylvan, Hasbroucq, Thierry, Osman, Allen · 1990 · Psychological Review
  2. Reactions toward the source of stimulation
    Simon, J. Richard · 1969 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  3. S-R compatibility: spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes.
    Fitts, Paul M., Seeger, Charles M. · 1953 · Journal of Experimental Psychology
  4. Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence
    De Jong, Ritske, Liang, Chia-Chin, Lauber, Erick · 1994 · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Show all 4 references

Cited by (10)

  1. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning
    Hommel, Bernhard, Müsseler, Jochen, Aschersleben, Gisa, Prinz, Wolfgang · 2001 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  2. Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control
    Pezzulo, Giovanni, Rigoli, Francesco, Friston, Karl · 2015 · Progress in Neurobiology
  3. Mirror neurons: from origin to function
    Cook, Richard, Bird, Geoffrey, Catmur, Caroline, Press, Clare, Heyes, Cecilia · 2014 · Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  4. An action perspective on motor development
    von Hofsten, Claes · 2004 · Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  5. Mechanisms of intentional binding and sensory attenuation: the role of temporal prediction, temporal control, identity prediction, and motor prediction
    Hughes, Gethin, Desantis, Andrea, Waszak, Florian · 2013 · Psychological Bulletin

See all 404

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.387
The paper
Kunde, W. (2001). Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.27.2.387

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.