Cited by 823Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesVisual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and Adaptation

Conditional and unconditional automaticity: a dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus–response correspondence

De Jong, Ritske, Liang, Chia-Chin, Lauber, Erick·1994·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.731

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.

    “Like many other forms of SRC in which participants respond to static symbolic stimuli (De Jong et al., 1994; Eimer et al., 1995), imitative compatibility effects are attributed to automatic activation of the stimulus-compatible motor representation.”
  • The evidence from the two experiments suggests that processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility.

    “In sum, the evidence from these two experiments suggests that the processing of spatial compatibility and automatic imitation are dissociable at two different levels in dual processing models of S-R compatibility (e.g., DeJong et al., 1994;Tagliabue, Zorzi, Umilta, & Bassignani, 2000).”
  • Responding to the stimulus cue opposite to the one that appears on the screen requires a logical recoding of the relevant stimulus, and this recoding carries over to the irrelevant stimulus.

    “Consistent with previous interpretations (e.g., DeJong, Liang, & Lauber, 1994;Wühr & Biebl, 2009), we surmise that responding to the stimulus cue opposite to the one that appears on the screen requires a logical recoding of the relevant stimulus and that this recoding carries-over to the irrelevant stimulus as well.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E.
Venue
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Published
1994
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
731-750
ISSN
  • 0096-1523 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1277
OpenAlex
W4248568169
Cited by
806
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 40 · 2012: 28
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
automaticity, dual-process models, spatial attention, stimulus-response compatibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review