The effects of contrast, stimulus duration, and spatial frequency on visible persistence in normal and specifically disabled readers.
Badcock, David, Lovegrove, William·1981·Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance
Cites (2)
- Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perceptionNavon, David · 1977 · Cognitive Psychology
- Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: Temporal and spatial propertiesLegge, Gordon E. · 1978 · Vision Research
Cited by (3)
- Specific reading disability (dyslexia): what have we learned in the past four decades?Vellutino, Frank R., Fletcher, Jack M., Snowling, Margaret J., Scanlon, Donna M. · 2004 · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Specific Reading Disability: Differences in Contrast Sensitivity as a Function of Spatial FrequencyLovegrove, W. J., Bowling, A., Badcock, D., Blackwood, M. · 1980 · Science
- A neuronal model of attentional spotlight: Parietal guiding the temporalVidyasagar, Trichur Raman · 1999 · Brain Research Reviews
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of contrast, stimulus duration, and spatial frequency on visible persistence in normal and specifically disabled readers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1037//0096-1523.7.3.495
- The paper
- Badcock, D., & Lovegrove, W. (1981). The effects of contrast, stimulus duration, and spatial frequency on visible persistence in normal and specifically disabled readers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.7.3.495
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
